FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 35W300 vs M4

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 35W300 and M4 are both steel grades. M4 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) against 320 MPa (46.4 ksi) for 35W300, about 72% more; tensile strength follows at 880 MPa (128 ksi) vs 470 MPa (68.2 ksi). In exchange, 35W300 is the more ductile: elongation 24% versus 12% for M4, and M4 is harder (265 HV vs 180 HV). 35W300 is lighter (7.65 g/cm³ vs 7.97 g/cm³ for M4) and M4 is stiffer (217 GPa vs 200 GPa). On the shop floor, 35W300 machines more easily (fair vs poor), 35W300 welds better (fair vs poor), and 35W300 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than M4 (specialty, $$$$$).

35W300Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

M4Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

35W300 vs M4: properties

35W300M4

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

200 GPa29 Msi
217 GPa31.5 Msi

Shear Modulus

79 GPa11.5 Msi
84 GPa12.2 Msi

Bulk Modulus

160 GPa23.2 Msi
165 GPa23.9 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.29
0.28

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

470 MPa68.2 ksi
880 MPa128 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

320 MPa46.4 ksi
550 MPa79.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

24%
12%

Shear Strength

340 MPa49.3 ksi
600 MPa87 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

220 MPa31.9 ksi
—

Hardness, Rockwell B

88 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

180 HV
265 HV

Reduction in Area

—
25%

Compressive Strength

—
1,600 MPa232 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
22 MPa·√m20 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

—
250 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
24 HRC

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.65 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.97 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,480°C2,696 °F
1,250°C2,282 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,505°C2,741 °F
1,420°C2,588 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

25 W/m·K14.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
22 W/m·K12.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
420 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11.8 µm/m·K6.6 µin/in·°F
11 µm/m·K6.1 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

260 J/g112 BTU/lb
250 J/g107 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
400°C752 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -60°C-76 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

3.6 % IACS
2.9 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m18.9 µΩ·in
6×10⁻⁷ Ω·m23.6 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

—
-0.58 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 18 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

42 / 100
25 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

50%
25%

Weldability

45 / 100
15 / 100

Formability (cold)

55 / 100
12 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

35 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
50 / 100

Castability

—
20 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

32 MJ/kg13,758 BTU/lb
58 MJ/kg24,936 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.5 kg CO₂/kg
4.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

60 L/kg7.2 gal/lb
110 L/kg13.2 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

25%
35%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

61 kN·m/kg
110 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.1 MN·m/kg
27.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

256 kJ/m³
697 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

7 mm²/s
6.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

5
8

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleM435W300

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability35W300M4
CNC machining—Yes
Default condition—Annealed
Relative cost$ Budget$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall—0.8 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
AlCrN—Yes
AlTiN—Yes
Black Oxide—Yes
CVD Al2O3—Yes
CVD TiCN—Yes
CVD TiN—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chrome Plating—Yes
CrN—Yes
DLC—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
HVOF Coating—Yes
Hot-Dip Galvanizing—Yes
MoS2—Yes
Multilayer CVD—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

35W300 vs M4 — frequently asked

Is M4 stronger than 35W300?

Yes. M4 has a typical yield strength of 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) against 320 MPa (46.4 ksi) for 35W300 — about 72% more. Tensile strength is 880 MPa (128 ksi) vs 470 MPa (68.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 35W300 or M4?

35W300 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while M4 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 35W300 or M4?

35W300. Its machinability rates fair (42/100) against poor (25/100) for M4; for welding the order is 35W300 first (fair, 45/100) then M4 (poor, 15/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 35W300 and M4 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.