FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 22MnB5 vs SPFC590

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 22MnB5 and SPFC590 are both steel grades. SPFC590 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 630 MPa (91.4 ksi) against 560 MPa (81.2 ksi) for 22MnB5, about 13% more. SPFC590 is the more ductile: elongation 27% versus 22% for 22MnB5, and SPFC590 is harder (183 HB vs 160 HB). SPFC590 runs hotter in service (300°C vs 250°C continuous) and SPFC590 conducts heat better (46 W/m·K vs 32 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 22MnB5 machines more easily (good vs fair), SPFC590 welds better (very good vs good), and SPFC590 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 22MnB5 (standard, $$).

22MnB5Choose it when the part is machined in volume.

SPFC590Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

22MnB5 vs SPFC590: properties

22MnB5SPFC590

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

210 GPa30.5 Msi
207 GPa30 Msi

Shear Modulus

81 GPa11.7 Msi
80 GPa11.6 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.29

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

560 MPa81.2 ksi
630 MPa91.4 ksi

Elongation at Break

22%
27%

Reduction in Area

55%
60%

Shear Strength

380 MPa55.1 ksi
420 MPa60.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
290 MPa42.1 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

60 J44.3 ft·lbf
45 J33.2 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

160 HB
183 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

85 HRB
90 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

170 HV
195 HV

Compressive Strength

—
390 MPa56.6 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
75 MPa·√m68.3 ksi·√in

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
10 HRC

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Yield Strength (0.2% offset) 380 MPa55.1 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,465°C2,669 °F
1,480°C2,696 °F

Same in both: Density 7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³ · Liquidus Temperature 1,520°C2,768 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

32 W/m·K18.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F
46 W/m·K26.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

480 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

12.5 µm/m·K6.9 µin/in·°F
12 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

260 J/g112 BTU/lb
247 J/g106 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

250°C482 °F
300°C572 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

8 % IACS
9.5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.66 µΩ·in
1.8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.09 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.6 V
-0.62 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 12 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
45 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

60%
50%

Weldability

65 / 100
78 / 100

Formability (cold)

60 / 100
58 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

50 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

25 MJ/kg10,748 BTU/lb
31 MJ/kg13,328 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.1 kg CO₂/kg
2.4 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

40 L/kg4.8 gal/lb
45 L/kg5.4 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

20%
25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

71 kN·m/kg
80 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.8 MN·m/kg
26.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

344 kJ/m³
349 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

8.5 mm²/s
12.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

7
12

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale22MnB5SPFC590

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability22MnB5SPFC590
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionCR—
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Black OxideYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chrome PlatingYes—
E-CoatingYes—
Hot-Dip GalvanizingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—
Zinc PlatingYes—
Zinc-Flake (Dip-Spin) CoatingYes—
Zinc-Nickel PlatingYes—

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

22MnB5 vs SPFC590 — frequently asked

Is SPFC590 stronger than 22MnB5?

Yes. SPFC590 has a typical tensile strength of 630 MPa (91.4 ksi) against 560 MPa (81.2 ksi) for 22MnB5 — about 13% more.

Which is cheaper, 22MnB5 or SPFC590?

SPFC590 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 22MnB5 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 22MnB5 or SPFC590?

22MnB5. Its machinability rates good (55/100) against fair (45/100) for SPFC590; for welding the order is SPFC590 first (very good, 78/100) then 22MnB5 (good, 65/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 22MnB5 and SPFC590 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.