FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 22MnB5 vs QP1180

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 22MnB5 and QP1180 are both steel grades. QP1180 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 920 MPa (133 ksi) against 380 MPa (55.1 ksi) for 22MnB5, about 142% more; tensile strength follows at 1,240 MPa (180 ksi) vs 560 MPa (81.2 ksi). In exchange, 22MnB5 is the more ductile: elongation 22% versus 15% for QP1180, and QP1180 is harder (360 HB vs 160 HB). 22MnB5 runs hotter in service (250°C vs 200°C continuous) and 22MnB5 conducts heat better (32 W/m·K vs 28 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 22MnB5 machines more easily (good vs poor) and QP1180 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 22MnB5 (standard, $$).

22MnB5Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

QP1180Choose it when strength drives the design, or when cost is the deciding factor.

22MnB5 vs QP1180: properties

22MnB5QP1180

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

210 GPa30.5 Msi
207 GPa30 Msi

Shear Modulus

81 GPa11.7 Msi
80 GPa11.6 Msi

Bulk Modulus

160 GPa23.2 Msi
165 GPa23.9 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

560 MPa81.2 ksi
1,240 MPa180 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

380 MPa55.1 ksi
920 MPa133 ksi

Elongation at Break

22%
15%

Reduction in Area

55%
—

Shear Strength

380 MPa55.1 ksi
740 MPa107 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
540 MPa78.3 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

60 J44.3 ft·lbf
—

Hardness, Brinell

160 HB
360 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

85 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

170 HV
380 HV

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
50 MPa·√m45.5 ksi·√in

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
39 HRC

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.3

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,465°C2,669 °F
1,450°C2,642 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,520°C2,768 °F
1,505°C2,741 °F

Same in both: Density 7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

32 W/m·K18.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F
28 W/m·K16.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

480 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

260 J/g112 BTU/lb
270 J/g116 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

250°C482 °F
200°C392 °F

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 12.5 µm/m·K6.9 µin/in·°F · Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

8 % IACS
3.8 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.66 µΩ·in
4.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m17.7 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.6 V
-0.61 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 12 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
22 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

60%
22%

Weldability

65 / 100
60 / 100

Formability (cold)

60 / 100
47 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

50 / 100
35 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

25 MJ/kg10,748 BTU/lb
32 MJ/kg13,758 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.1 kg CO₂/kg
2.4 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

40 L/kg4.8 gal/lb
50 L/kg6 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

20%
25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

71 kN·m/kg
158 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.8 MN·m/kg
26.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

344 kJ/m³
2,044 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

8.5 mm²/s
7.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

7
13

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale22MnB5QP1180

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability22MnB5QP1180
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionCR—
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Black OxideYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chrome PlatingYes—
E-CoatingYes—
Hot-Dip GalvanizingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—
Zinc PlatingYes—
Zinc-Flake (Dip-Spin) CoatingYes—
Zinc-Nickel PlatingYes—

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

22MnB5 vs QP1180 — frequently asked

Is QP1180 stronger than 22MnB5?

Yes. QP1180 has a typical yield strength of 920 MPa (133 ksi) against 380 MPa (55.1 ksi) for 22MnB5 — about 142% more. Tensile strength is 1,240 MPa (180 ksi) vs 560 MPa (81.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 22MnB5 or QP1180?

QP1180 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 22MnB5 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 22MnB5 or QP1180?

22MnB5. Its machinability rates good (55/100) against poor (22/100) for QP1180; for welding the order is 22MnB5 first (good, 65/100) then QP1180 (good, 60/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 22MnB5 and QP1180 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.