FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 2083 vs P20

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 2083 and P20 are both steel grades, both mold steel. 2083 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) against 440 MPa (63.8 ksi) for P20, about 9% more; tensile strength follows at 760 MPa (110 ksi) vs 700 MPa (102 ksi). In exchange, P20 is the more ductile: elongation 20% versus 16% for 2083, and 2083 is harder (230 HB vs 200 HB). P20 runs hotter in service (450°C vs 400°C continuous) and P20 conducts heat better (32 W/m·K vs 25 W/m·K). On the shop floor, P20 machines more easily (good vs fair), P20 welds better (fair vs poor), and 2083 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than P20 (specialty, $$$$$).

2083Choose it when strength drives the design, or when cost is the deciding factor.

P20Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

2083 vs P20: properties

2083P20

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

215 GPa31.2 Msi
205 GPa29.7 Msi

Shear Modulus

82 GPa11.9 Msi
80 GPa11.6 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.28
0.29

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

760 MPa110 ksi
700 MPa102 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

480 MPa69.6 ksi
440 MPa63.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

16%
20%

Reduction in Area

40%
55%

Compressive Strength

500 MPa72.5 ksi
900 MPa131 ksi

Shear Strength

460 MPa66.7 ksi
620 MPa89.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

360 MPa52.2 ksi
460 MPa66.7 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

20 J14.8 ft·lbf
45 J33.2 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

230 HB
200 HB

Hardness, Vickers

240 HV
315 HV

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
65 MPa·√m59.2 ksi·√in

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
93 HRB

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
31 HRC

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.7 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.8 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,450°C2,642 °F
1,420°C2,588 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,510°C2,750 °F
1,480°C2,696 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

25 W/m·K14.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
32 W/m·K18.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

10.6 µm/m·K5.9 µin/in·°F
12.4 µm/m·K6.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

400°C752 °F
450°C842 °F

Latent Heat of Fusion

—
250 J/g107 BTU/lb

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Min Service Temperature -20°C-4 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

5.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m21.7 µΩ·in
2.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.66 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.25 V
-0.6 V

Corrosion Resistance

42 / 100
15 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

40 / 100
65 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

45%
75%

Weldability

25 / 100
50 / 100

Formability (cold)

20 / 100
30 / 100

Polishability

85 / 100
55 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

—
40 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

36 MJ/kg15,477 BTU/lb
32 MJ/kg13,758 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.9 kg CO₂/kg
2.2 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Embodied Water 60 L/kg7.2 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 40%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

99 kN·m/kg
90 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

27.9 MN·m/kg
26.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

536 kJ/m³
472 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

7.1 mm²/s
8.9 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

8
9

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleP202083

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability2083P20
Default conditionAnnealedAnnealed
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall0.8 mm0.8 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µmRa 1.6 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining. Both take the same 38 finishes: AlCrN, AlTiN, Black Oxide, CVD Al2O3, CVD TiCN, CVD TiN, Cerakote, Chrome Plating, Copper Plating, CrN, DLC, E-Coating and 26 more.

2083 vs P20 — frequently asked

Is 2083 stronger than P20?

Yes. 2083 has a typical yield strength of 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) against 440 MPa (63.8 ksi) for P20 — about 9% more. Tensile strength is 760 MPa (110 ksi) vs 700 MPa (102 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 2083 or P20?

2083 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while P20 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 2083 or P20?

P20. Its machinability rates good (65/100) against fair (40/100) for 2083; for welding the order is P20 first (fair, 50/100) then 2083 (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 2083 and P20 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.