FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 12CrNi3A vs 34MnB5

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 12CrNi3A and 34MnB5 are both steel grades. 12CrNi3A is the stronger of the two: yield strength 785 MPa (114 ksi) against 420 MPa (60.9 ksi) for 34MnB5, about 87% more; tensile strength follows at 980 MPa (142 ksi) vs 620 MPa (89.9 ksi). 12CrNi3A is harder — 300 HB against 185 HB for 34MnB5 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. 34MnB5 runs hotter in service (400°C vs 200°C continuous) and 34MnB5 conducts heat better (44 W/m·K vs 34 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 34MnB5 machines more easily (good vs fair), 34MnB5 welds better (good vs fair), and 34MnB5 forms better (good vs poor).

12CrNi3AChoose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

34MnB5Choose it when the part sees heat, or when the part is machined in volume.

12CrNi3A vs 34MnB5: properties

12CrNi3A34MnB5

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Bulk Modulus

165 GPa23.9 Msi
160 GPa23.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

980 MPa142 ksi
620 MPa89.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

785 MPa114 ksi
420 MPa60.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

13%
14%

Reduction in Area

56%
45%

Compressive Strength

790 MPa115 ksi
—

Shear Strength

590 MPa85.6 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

470 MPa68.2 ksi
280 MPa40.6 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

100 MPa·√m91 ksi·√in
55 MPa·√m50.1 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

80 J59 ft·lbf
40 J29.5 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

300 HB
185 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

31 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

315 HV
195 HV

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
89 HRB

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 210 GPa30.5 Msi · Shear Modulus 80 GPa11.6 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Liquidus Temperature

1,490°C2,714 °F
1,495°C2,723 °F

Same in both: Density 7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,420°C2,588 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

34 W/m·K19.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
44 W/m·K25.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11.8 µm/m·K6.6 µin/in·°F
12.5 µm/m·K6.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
400°C752 °F

Min Service Temperature

-70°C-94 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 250 J/g107 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

5.7 % IACS
8 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3×10⁻⁷ Ω·m11.8 µΩ·in
2.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.66 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

13 / 100
11 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.6 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

40 / 100
55 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

40%
60%

Weldability

35 / 100
55 / 100

Formability (cold)

22 / 100
60 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

55 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

68 / 100
55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

32 MJ/kg13,758 BTU/lb
25 MJ/kg10,748 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.4 kg CO₂/kg
2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

65 L/kg7.8 gal/lb
40 L/kg4.8 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

125 kN·m/kg
79 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,467 kJ/m³
420 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

9.4 mm²/s
11.9 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

13
10

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 26.8 MN·m/kg

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale34MnB512CrNi3A

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability12CrNi3A34MnB5
Sheet metal—Yes
Default condition—CR
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Black Oxide—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chrome Plating—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
Hot-Dip Galvanizing—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Powder Coating—Yes
Tin Plating—Yes
Zinc Plating—Yes
Zinc-Flake (Dip-Spin) Coating—Yes
Zinc-Nickel Plating—Yes

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

12CrNi3A vs 34MnB5 — frequently asked

Is 12CrNi3A stronger than 34MnB5?

Yes. 12CrNi3A has a typical yield strength of 785 MPa (114 ksi) against 420 MPa (60.9 ksi) for 34MnB5 — about 87% more. Tensile strength is 980 MPa (142 ksi) vs 620 MPa (89.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 12CrNi3A or 34MnB5?

12CrNi3A is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 34MnB5 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 12CrNi3A or 34MnB5?

34MnB5. Its machinability rates good (55/100) against fair (40/100) for 12CrNi3A; for welding the order is 34MnB5 first (good, 55/100) then 12CrNi3A (fair, 35/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 12CrNi3A and 34MnB5 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.