FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 10B22 QT-109 vs 10B22 QT-98

Steel · 10B22 temper comparison

10B22 QT-109 and 10B22 QT-98 are two conditions of the same steel grade, 10B22: QT-109 versus QT-98. The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. 10B22 QT-109 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 990 MPa (144 ksi) against 780 MPa (113 ksi) for 10B22 QT-98, about 27% more; tensile strength follows at 1,100 MPa (160 ksi) vs 950 MPa (138 ksi). In exchange, 10B22 QT-98 is the more ductile: elongation 12% versus 10% for 10B22 QT-109, and 10B22 QT-109 is harder (330 HB vs 300 HB). 10B22 QT-109 conducts electricity better (10 % IACS vs 9 % IACS). On the shop floor, 10B22 QT-109 machines more easily (good vs fair) and 10B22 QT-109 welds better (very good vs fair).

10B22 QT-109Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

10B22 QT-98Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

10B22 QT-109 vs 10B22 QT-98: properties

10B22 QT-10910B22 QT-98

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

1,100 MPa160 ksi
950 MPa138 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

990 MPa144 ksi
780 MPa113 ksi

Elongation at Break

10%
12%

Reduction in Area

48%
52%

Shear Strength

660 MPa95.7 ksi
570 MPa82.7 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

450 MPa65.3 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

75 MPa·√m68.3 ksi·√in
65 MPa·√m59.2 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

330 HB
300 HB

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 205 GPa29.7 Msi · Shear Modulus 80 GPa11.6 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29 · Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT) 40 J29.5 ft·lbf · Hardness, Rockwell B 89 HRB

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,450°C2,642 °F · Liquidus Temperature 1,510°C2,750 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

49 W/m·K28.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
46 W/m·K26.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

280°C536 °F
300°C572 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 11.9 µm/m·K6.6 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 250 J/g107 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -30°C-22 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

10 % IACS
9 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.7×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.69 µΩ·in
1.9×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.48 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

9 / 100
10 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.6 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
42 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

45%
50%

Weldability

72 / 100
48 / 100

Formability (cold)

85 / 100
25 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 65 / 100 · Polishability 50 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 25 MJ/kg10,748 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 1.9 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 40 L/kg4.8 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 30%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale10B22

10B22 QT-109 vs 10B22 QT-98 — frequently asked

Is 10B22 QT-109 stronger than 10B22 QT-98?

Yes. 10B22 QT-109 has a typical yield strength of 990 MPa (144 ksi) against 780 MPa (113 ksi) for 10B22 QT-98 — about 27% more. Tensile strength is 1,100 MPa (160 ksi) vs 950 MPa (138 ksi).

Which condition does FabDigit quote by default, QT-109 or QT-98?

CD is the default 10B22 condition in the FabDigit quote flow (neither QT-109 nor QT-98). The other condition is available on request or by drawing note — specify it in the material field or the part notes and the quote is priced for it.

Which is easier to machine, 10B22 QT-109 or 10B22 QT-98?

10B22 QT-109. Its machinability rates good (55/100) against fair (42/100) for 10B22 QT-98; for welding the order is 10B22 QT-109 first (very good, 72/100) then 10B22 QT-98 (fair, 48/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 10B22 QT-109 and 10B22 QT-98 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.