FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel X108CrMo17-A vs X108CrMo17-QT52

Stainless Steel · X108CrMo17 temper comparison

X108CrMo17-A and X108CrMo17-QT52 are two conditions of the same stainless steel grade, X108CrMo17: A (solution annealed) versus QT52 (hardened + tempered 400–500 °C, 50–54 HRC). The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. X108CrMo17-QT52 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 1,550 MPa (225 ksi) against 450 MPa (65.3 ksi) for X108CrMo17-A, about 3.4 times as much; tensile strength follows at 1,700 MPa (247 ksi) vs 760 MPa (110 ksi). In exchange, X108CrMo17-A is the more ductile: elongation 14% versus 4% for X108CrMo17-QT52, and X108CrMo17-QT52 is harder (550 HV vs 245 HV). On the shop floor, X108CrMo17-A machines more easily (fair vs not recommended).

X108CrMo17-AChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

X108CrMo17-QT52Choose it when strength drives the design.

X108CrMo17-A vs X108CrMo17-QT52: properties

X108CrMo17-AX108CrMo17-QT52

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

760 MPa110 ksi
1,700 MPa247 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

450 MPa65.3 ksi
1,550 MPa225 ksi

Elongation at Break

14%
4%

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

350 MPa50.8 ksi
650 MPa94.3 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

20 J14.8 ft·lbf
8 J5.9 ft·lbf

Hardness, Vickers

245 HV
550 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 200 GPa29 Msi · Shear Modulus 78 GPa11.3 Msi · Bulk Modulus 166 GPa24.1 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.28 · Reduction in Area 25% · Compressive Strength 460 MPa66.7 ksi · Shear Strength 480 MPa69.6 ksi · Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 45 MPa·√m41 ksi·√in · Hardness, Brinell 235 HB · Hardness, Rockwell B 98 HRB

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 7.7 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,370°C2,498 °F · Liquidus Temperature 1,480°C2,696 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 24.2 W/m·K14 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Specific Heat Capacity 460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 10.2 µm/m·K5.7 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 270 J/g116 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 400°C752 °F · Min Service Temperature -70°C-94 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 2.9 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 6×10⁻⁷ Ω·m23.6 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

40 / 100
35 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.25 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

35 / 100
12 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 40% · Weldability 15 / 100 · Formability (cold) 20 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 45 / 100 · Polishability 85 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 58 MJ/kg24,936 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 5.4 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 160 L/kg19.2 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 45%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleX108CrMo17

X108CrMo17-A vs X108CrMo17-QT52 — frequently asked

Is X108CrMo17-QT52 stronger than X108CrMo17-A?

Yes. X108CrMo17-QT52 has a typical yield strength of 1,550 MPa (225 ksi) against 450 MPa (65.3 ksi) for X108CrMo17-A — about 3.4 times as much. Tensile strength is 1,700 MPa (247 ksi) vs 760 MPa (110 ksi).

Which condition does FabDigit quote by default, A or QT52?

A is the default X108CrMo17 condition in the FabDigit quote flow. The other condition is available on request or by drawing note — specify it in the material field or the part notes and the quote is priced for it.

Which is easier to machine, X108CrMo17-A or X108CrMo17-QT52?

X108CrMo17-A. Its machinability rates fair (35/100) against not recommended (12/100) for X108CrMo17-QT52.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in X108CrMo17-A and X108CrMo17-QT52 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.