FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 420 vs X108CrMo17

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel 420 and X108CrMo17 are both stainless steel grades. X108CrMo17 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 450 MPa (65.3 ksi) against 360 MPa (52.2 ksi) for 420, about 25% more; tensile strength follows at 760 MPa (110 ksi) vs 690 MPa (100 ksi). In exchange, 420 is the more ductile: elongation 22% versus 14% for X108CrMo17, and X108CrMo17 is harder (235 HB vs 200 HB). 420 runs hotter in service (650°C vs 400°C continuous). On the shop floor, 420 machines more easily (45 vs 35 out of 100) and 420 welds better (25 vs 15 out of 100).

420Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

X108CrMo17Choose it when strength drives the design.

420 vs X108CrMo17: properties

420X108CrMo17

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Bulk Modulus

160 GPa23.2 Msi
166 GPa24.1 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.29
0.28

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

690 MPa100 ksi
760 MPa110 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

360 MPa52.2 ksi
450 MPa65.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

22%
14%

Reduction in Area

55%
25%

Compressive Strength

380 MPa55.1 ksi
460 MPa66.7 ksi

Shear Strength

420 MPa60.9 ksi
480 MPa69.6 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

60 MPa·√m54.6 ksi·√in
45 MPa·√m41 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

25 J18.4 ft·lbf
20 J14.8 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

200 HB
235 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

93 HRB
98 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

210 HV
245 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 200 GPa29 Msi · Shear Modulus 78 GPa11.3 Msi · Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit) 350 MPa50.8 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.75 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.7 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,454°C2,649 °F
1,370°C2,498 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,510°C2,750 °F
1,480°C2,696 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

24.9 W/m·K14.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
24.2 W/m·K14 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

10.3 µm/m·K5.7 µin/in·°F
10.2 µm/m·K5.7 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

260 J/g112 BTU/lb
270 J/g116 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

650°C1,202 °F
400°C752 °F

Min Service Temperature

-30°C-22 °F
-70°C-94 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

3.1 % IACS
2.9 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m21.7 µΩ·in
6×10⁻⁷ Ω·m23.6 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.3 V
-0.25 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 40 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

45 / 100
35 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

45%
40%

Weldability

25 / 100
15 / 100

Formability (cold)

40 / 100
20 / 100

Castability

45 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

40 / 100
45 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 85 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb
58 MJ/kg24,936 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.5 kg CO₂/kg
5.4 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
160 L/kg19.2 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 45%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

89 kN·m/kg
99 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.8 MN·m/kg
26 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

324 kJ/m³
506 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

7 mm²/s
6.8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

8
9

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale420X108CrMo17

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability420X108CrMo17
CNC machiningYes—
Default conditionAnnealed—
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
AlCrNYes—
AlTiNYes—
Black OxideYes—
CVD Al2O3Yes—
CVD TiCNYes—
CVD TiNYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chrome PlatingYes—
CrNYes—
DLCYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
HVOF CoatingYes—
MoS2Yes—
Multilayer CVDYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Passivation (Stainless Steel)Yes—

They share 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

420 vs X108CrMo17 — frequently asked

Is X108CrMo17 stronger than 420?

Yes. X108CrMo17 has a typical yield strength of 450 MPa (65.3 ksi) against 360 MPa (52.2 ksi) for 420 — about 25% more. Tensile strength is 760 MPa (110 ksi) vs 690 MPa (100 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 420 or X108CrMo17?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 420 or X108CrMo17?

420, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 45/100 against 35/100 for X108CrMo17; for welding the order is 420 first (poor, 25/100) then X108CrMo17 (poor, 15/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 420 and X108CrMo17 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.