FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 353 MA vs Alloy 20

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel 353 MA and Alloy 20 are both stainless steel grades. 353 MA is the stronger of the two: yield strength 350 MPa (50.8 ksi) against 310 MPa (45 ksi) for Alloy 20, about 13% more; tensile strength follows at 730 MPa (106 ksi) vs 620 MPa (89.9 ksi). 353 MA is the more ductile: elongation 45% versus 40% for Alloy 20, and 353 MA is harder (180 HB vs 160 HB). 353 MA runs hotter in service (1,150°C vs 500°C continuous). On the shop floor, Alloy 20 machines more easily (fair vs poor), Alloy 20 welds better (very good vs good), and 353 MA sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than Alloy 20 (specialty, $$$$$).

353 MAChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Alloy 20Choose it when the part is machined in volume, or when it will be welded.

353 MA vs Alloy 20: properties

353 MAAlloy 20

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

196 GPa28.4 Msi
193 GPa28 Msi

Shear Modulus

76 GPa11 Msi
74 GPa10.7 Msi

Bulk Modulus

156 GPa22.6 Msi
160 GPa23.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

730 MPa106 ksi
620 MPa89.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

350 MPa50.8 ksi
310 MPa45 ksi

Elongation at Break

45%
40%

Reduction in Area

55%
60%

Compressive Strength

355 MPa51.5 ksi
—

Shear Strength

480 MPa69.6 ksi
415 MPa60.2 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

280 MPa40.6 ksi
260 MPa37.7 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

180 MPa·√m164 ksi·√in
—

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

130 J95.9 ft·lbf
190 J140 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

180 HB
160 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

88 HRB
85 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

190 HV
—

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.3

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.9 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³
8.08 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,330°C2,426 °F
1,370°C2,498 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,390°C2,534 °F
1,425°C2,597 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Specific Heat Capacity

450 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

15.5 µm/m·K8.6 µin/in·°F
14.8 µm/m·K8.2 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

270 J/g116 BTU/lb
285 J/g123 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

1,150°C2,102 °F
500°C932 °F

Min Service Temperature

-100°C-148 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 12 W/m·K6.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

1.7 % IACS
1.6 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1×10⁻⁶ Ω·m39.4 µΩ·in
1.08×10⁻⁶ Ω·m42.5 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.1 V
-0.08 V

Corrosion Resistance

55 / 100
80 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

28 / 100
38 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

25%
40%

Weldability

65 / 100
80 / 100

Formability (cold)

55 / 100
72 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

50 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
75 / 100

Castability

—
55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

85 MJ/kg36,543 BTU/lb
100 MJ/kg42,992 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

6.2 kg CO₂/kg
7.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

220 L/kg26.4 gal/lb
200 L/kg24 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

40%
45%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

92 kN·m/kg
77 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

24.8 MN·m/kg
23.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

313 kJ/m³
249 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3.4 mm²/s
3 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleAlloy 20353 MA

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability353 MAAlloy 20
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Default condition—Annealed
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall—0.8 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
AlCrN—Yes
AlTiN—Yes
Black Oxide—Yes
CVD Al2O3—Yes
CVD TiCN—Yes
CVD TiN—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chrome Plating—Yes
CrN—Yes
DLC—Yes
Electropolishing—Yes
HVOF Coating—Yes
MoS2—Yes
Multilayer CVD—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Passivation (Stainless Steel)—Yes

They share 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

353 MA vs Alloy 20 — frequently asked

Is 353 MA stronger than Alloy 20?

Yes. 353 MA has a typical yield strength of 350 MPa (50.8 ksi) against 310 MPa (45 ksi) for Alloy 20 — about 13% more. Tensile strength is 730 MPa (106 ksi) vs 620 MPa (89.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 353 MA or Alloy 20?

353 MA is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while Alloy 20 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 353 MA or Alloy 20?

Alloy 20. Its machinability rates fair (38/100) against poor (28/100) for 353 MA; for welding the order is Alloy 20 first (very good, 80/100) then 353 MA (good, 65/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 353 MA and Alloy 20 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.