Stainless Steel 316Ti Cold Drawn vs 316Ti Solution Annealed
Stainless Steel · 316Ti temper comparison
316Ti Cold Drawn and 316Ti Solution Annealed are two conditions of the same stainless steel grade, 316Ti: Cold Drawn versus Solution Annealed. The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. 316Ti Cold Drawn is the stronger of the two: yield strength 520 MPa (75.4 ksi) against 260 MPa (37.7 ksi) for 316Ti Solution Annealed, about 100% more; tensile strength follows at 760 MPa (110 ksi) vs 580 MPa (84.1 ksi). In exchange, 316Ti Solution Annealed is the more ductile: elongation 45% versus 22% for 316Ti Cold Drawn, and 316Ti Cold Drawn is harder (230 HB vs 160 HB). 316Ti Solution Annealed runs hotter in service (800°C vs 425°C continuous).
316Ti Cold DrawnChoose it when strength drives the design.
316Ti Solution AnnealedChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.
316Ti Cold Drawn vs 316Ti Solution Annealed: propertiesHow to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all stainless steel grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
How to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all stainless steel grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
316Ti Cold Drawn316Ti Solution Annealed
Mechanical
Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.
Tensile Strength (Ultimate)
Yield Strength (0.2% offset)
Elongation at Break
Reduction in Area
Compressive Strength
Shear Strength
Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)
Fracture Toughness (K_IC)
Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)
Hardness, Brinell
Hardness, Rockwell B
Hardness, Vickers
Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 200 GPa29 Msi · Shear Modulus 77 GPa11.2 Msi · Bulk Modulus 166 GPa24.1 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.3
Physical
Density and transition temperatures.
Same in both: Density 8 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,375°C2,507 °F · Liquidus Temperature 1,400°C2,552 °F
Thermal
How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.
Max Service Temperature (continuous)
Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 15 W/m·K8.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Specific Heat Capacity 500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 16.5 µm/m·K9.2 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 270 J/g116 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F
Electrical
Conductivity and insulation.
Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 2.3 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 7.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m29.5 µΩ·in
Chemical & Environmental
Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).
Corrosion Resistance
Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.05 V
Manufacturability
FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.
Machinability
Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)
Weldability
Formability (cold)
Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 70 / 100 · Polishability 55 / 100
Sustainability
Primary-production footprint per kilogram.
Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 58 MJ/kg24,936 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 5.2 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 180 L/kg21.6 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 65%
Strength versus weight
Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.
316Ti Cold Drawn vs 316Ti Solution Annealed — frequently asked
Is 316Ti Cold Drawn stronger than 316Ti Solution Annealed?
Yes. 316Ti Cold Drawn has a typical yield strength of 520 MPa (75.4 ksi) against 260 MPa (37.7 ksi) for 316Ti Solution Annealed — about 100% more. Tensile strength is 760 MPa (110 ksi) vs 580 MPa (84.1 ksi).
Which condition does FabDigit quote by default, Cold Drawn or Solution Annealed?
Solution Annealed is the default 316Ti condition in the FabDigit quote flow. The other condition is available on request or by drawing note — specify it in the material field or the part notes and the quote is priced for it.
Which welds better, 316Ti Cold Drawn or 316Ti Solution Annealed?
316Ti Solution Annealed. Its weldability rates excellent (85/100) against very good (80/100) for 316Ti Cold Drawn.
Ready to make it?
Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 316Ti Cold Drawn and 316Ti Solution Annealed side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.
Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.