FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 301 vs S31730

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel 301 and S31730 are both stainless steel grades. 301 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 570 MPa (82.7 ksi) against 255 MPa (37 ksi) for S31730, about 124% more; tensile strength follows at 900 MPa (131 ksi) vs 580 MPa (84.1 ksi). In exchange, S31730 is the more ductile: elongation 45% versus 25% for 301, and 301 is harder (270 HB vs 165 HB). S31730 runs hotter in service (870°C vs 425°C continuous) and 301 conducts heat better (16.2 W/m·K vs 14.5 W/m·K). On the shop floor, S31730 welds better (very good vs good).

301Choose it when strength drives the design.

S31730Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

301 vs S31730: properties

301S31730

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

193 GPa28 Msi
195 GPa28.3 Msi

Bulk Modulus

152 GPa22 Msi
160 GPa23.2 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.28
0.29

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

900 MPa131 ksi
580 MPa84.1 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

570 MPa82.7 ksi
255 MPa37 ksi

Elongation at Break

25%
45%

Reduction in Area

45%
65%

Compressive Strength

580 MPa84.1 ksi
—

Shear Strength

560 MPa81.2 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

400 MPa58 ksi
250 MPa36.3 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

110 MPa·√m100 ksi·√in
200 MPa·√m182 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

60 J44.3 ft·lbf
160 J118 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

270 HB
165 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

100 HRB
85 HRB

Hardness, Rockwell C

27 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

285 HV
—

Same in both: Shear Modulus 77 GPa11.2 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.88 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
8 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,395°C2,543 °F
1,375°C2,507 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,420°C2,588 °F
1,425°C2,597 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

16.2 W/m·K9.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
14.5 W/m·K8.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

16.9 µm/m·K9.4 µin/in·°F
16.2 µm/m·K9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

425°C797 °F
870°C1,598 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 270 J/g116 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

2.4 % IACS
2.3 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

7.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m28.3 µΩ·in
7.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m29.5 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.1 V
-0.08 V

Corrosion Resistance

60 / 100
74 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

35 / 100
33 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

40%
38%

Weldability

65 / 100
78 / 100

Formability (cold)

65 / 100
72 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
65 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

53 MJ/kg22,786 BTU/lb
82 MJ/kg35,254 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.8 kg CO₂/kg
5.4 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Embodied Water 150 L/kg18 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 55%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

114 kN·m/kg
73 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

24.5 MN·m/kg
24.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

842 kJ/m³
167 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

4.1 mm²/s
3.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

4
3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale301S31730

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability301S31730
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionCold Rolled—
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Black OxideYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Passivation (Stainless Steel)Yes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

301 vs S31730 — frequently asked

Is 301 stronger than S31730?

Yes. 301 has a typical yield strength of 570 MPa (82.7 ksi) against 255 MPa (37 ksi) for S31730 — about 124% more. Tensile strength is 900 MPa (131 ksi) vs 580 MPa (84.1 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 301 or S31730?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, 301 or S31730?

S31730. Its weldability rates very good (78/100) against good (65/100) for 301.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 301 and S31730 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.