FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 301 vs Alloy 611

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel 301 and Alloy 611 are both stainless steel grades. 301 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 570 MPa (82.7 ksi) against 330 MPa (47.9 ksi) for Alloy 611, about 73% more; tensile strength follows at 900 MPa (131 ksi) vs 650 MPa (94.3 ksi). In exchange, Alloy 611 is the more ductile: elongation 45% versus 25% for 301, and 301 is harder (270 HB vs 190 HB). Alloy 611 is lighter (7.6 g/cm³ vs 7.88 g/cm³ for 301) and Alloy 611 runs hotter in service (800°C vs 425°C continuous). On the shop floor, 301 sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than Alloy 611 (high, $$$$).

301Choose it when strength drives the design, or when cost is the deciding factor.

Alloy 611Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

301 vs Alloy 611: properties

301Alloy 611

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

193 GPa28 Msi
190 GPa27.6 Msi

Shear Modulus

77 GPa11.2 Msi
73 GPa10.6 Msi

Bulk Modulus

152 GPa22 Msi
158 GPa22.9 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.28
0.3

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

900 MPa131 ksi
650 MPa94.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

570 MPa82.7 ksi
330 MPa47.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

25%
45%

Reduction in Area

45%
—

Compressive Strength

580 MPa84.1 ksi
—

Shear Strength

560 MPa81.2 ksi
420 MPa60.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

400 MPa58 ksi
270 MPa39.2 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

110 MPa·√m100 ksi·√in
—

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

60 J44.3 ft·lbf
90 J66.4 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

270 HB
190 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

100 HRB
90 HRB

Hardness, Rockwell C

27 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

285 HV
200 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.88 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.6 g/cm³0.27 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,395°C2,543 °F
1,350°C2,462 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,420°C2,588 °F
1,410°C2,570 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

16.2 W/m·K9.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
12 W/m·K6.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

16.9 µm/m·K9.4 µin/in·°F
15.5 µm/m·K8.6 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

270 J/g116 BTU/lb
—

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

425°C797 °F
800°C1,472 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-100°C-148 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

2.4 % IACS
—

Electrical Resistivity

7.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m28.3 µΩ·in
9.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m37.4 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

60 / 100
72 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.1 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

35 / 100
30 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

40%
35%

Weldability

65 / 100
60 / 100

Formability (cold)

65 / 100
68 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

60 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

53 MJ/kg22,786 BTU/lb
62 MJ/kg26,655 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.8 kg CO₂/kg
6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

150 L/kg18 gal/lb
180 L/kg21.6 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

55%
45%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

114 kN·m/kg
86 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

24.5 MN·m/kg
25 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

842 kJ/m³
287 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

4.1 mm²/s
3.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

4
3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale301Alloy 611

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability301Alloy 611
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionCold Rolled—
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Black OxideYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Passivation (Stainless Steel)Yes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

301 vs Alloy 611 — frequently asked

Is 301 stronger than Alloy 611?

Yes. 301 has a typical yield strength of 570 MPa (82.7 ksi) against 330 MPa (47.9 ksi) for Alloy 611 — about 73% more. Tensile strength is 900 MPa (131 ksi) vs 650 MPa (94.3 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 301 or Alloy 611?

301 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while Alloy 611 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 301 or Alloy 611?

301. Its machinability rates fair (35/100) against poor (30/100) for Alloy 611; for welding the order is 301 first (good, 65/100) then Alloy 611 (good, 60/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 301 and Alloy 611 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.