FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 301 vs 348

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel 301 and 348 are both stainless steel grades. 301 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 570 MPa (82.7 ksi) against 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) for 348, about 128% more; tensile strength follows at 900 MPa (131 ksi) vs 620 MPa (89.9 ksi). In exchange, 348 is the more ductile: elongation 45% versus 25% for 301, and 301 is harder (270 HB vs 160 HB). 348 runs hotter in service (870°C vs 425°C continuous). On the shop floor, 348 welds better (excellent vs good) and 301 sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than 348 (high, $$$$).

301Choose it when strength drives the design, or when cost is the deciding factor.

348Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

301 vs 348: properties

301348

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Bulk Modulus

152 GPa22 Msi
160 GPa23.2 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.28
0.29

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

900 MPa131 ksi
620 MPa89.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

570 MPa82.7 ksi
250 MPa36.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

25%
45%

Reduction in Area

45%
65%

Compressive Strength

580 MPa84.1 ksi
250 MPa36.3 ksi

Shear Strength

560 MPa81.2 ksi
430 MPa62.4 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

400 MPa58 ksi
250 MPa36.3 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

110 MPa·√m100 ksi·√in
220 MPa·√m200 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

60 J44.3 ft·lbf
150 J111 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

270 HB
160 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

100 HRB
80 HRB

Hardness, Rockwell C

27 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

285 HV
170 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 193 GPa28 Msi · Shear Modulus 77 GPa11.2 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.88 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.96 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,395°C2,543 °F
1,400°C2,552 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,420°C2,588 °F
1,430°C2,606 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

16.2 W/m·K9.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
16.3 W/m·K9.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

16.9 µm/m·K9.4 µin/in·°F
16.6 µm/m·K9.2 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

270 J/g116 BTU/lb
285 J/g123 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

425°C797 °F
870°C1,598 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

7.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m28.3 µΩ·in
7.3×10⁻⁷ Ω·m28.7 µΩ·in

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 2.4 % IACS

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.1 V
-0.05 V

Corrosion Resistance

60 / 100
62 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

35 / 100
38 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

40%
42%

Weldability

65 / 100
85 / 100

Formability (cold)

65 / 100
80 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

60 / 100
65 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
78 / 100

Castability

—
45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.8 kg CO₂/kg
5.4 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 53 MJ/kg22,786 BTU/lb · Embodied Water 150 L/kg18 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 55%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

114 kN·m/kg
78 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

24.5 MN·m/kg
24.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

842 kJ/m³
162 kJ/m³

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

4
3

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 4.1 mm²/s

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale301348

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability301348
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionCold Rolled—
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Black OxideYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Passivation (Stainless Steel)Yes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

301 vs 348 — frequently asked

Is 301 stronger than 348?

Yes. 301 has a typical yield strength of 570 MPa (82.7 ksi) against 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) for 348 — about 128% more. Tensile strength is 900 MPa (131 ksi) vs 620 MPa (89.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 301 or 348?

301 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while 348 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, 301 or 348?

348. Its weldability rates excellent (85/100) against good (65/100) for 301.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 301 and 348 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.