FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 301 vs 317L

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel 301 and 317L are both stainless steel grades, both corrosion resistant ss. 301 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 570 MPa (82.7 ksi) against 265 MPa (38.4 ksi) for 317L, about 115% more; tensile strength follows at 900 MPa (131 ksi) vs 580 MPa (84.1 ksi). In exchange, 317L is the more ductile: elongation 50% versus 25% for 301, and 301 is harder (270 HB vs 155 HB). 317L runs hotter in service (870°C vs 425°C continuous) and 301 conducts heat better (16.2 W/m·K vs 14.2 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 317L welds better (excellent vs good).

301Choose it when strength drives the design.

317LChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

301 vs 317L: properties

301317L

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

193 GPa28 Msi
200 GPa29 Msi

Bulk Modulus

152 GPa22 Msi
160 GPa23.2 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.28
0.3

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

900 MPa131 ksi
580 MPa84.1 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

570 MPa82.7 ksi
265 MPa38.4 ksi

Elongation at Break

25%
50%

Reduction in Area

45%
65%

Compressive Strength

580 MPa84.1 ksi
—

Shear Strength

560 MPa81.2 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

400 MPa58 ksi
250 MPa36.3 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

110 MPa·√m100 ksi·√in
200 MPa·√m182 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

60 J44.3 ft·lbf
180 J133 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

270 HB
155 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

100 HRB
82 HRB

Hardness, Rockwell C

27 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

285 HV
165 HV

Same in both: Shear Modulus 77 GPa11.2 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.88 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.98 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,395°C2,543 °F
1,375°C2,507 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,420°C2,588 °F
1,400°C2,552 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

16.2 W/m·K9.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
14.2 W/m·K8.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

16.9 µm/m·K9.4 µin/in·°F
16 µm/m·K8.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

425°C797 °F
870°C1,598 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 270 J/g116 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

2.4 % IACS
2.2 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

7.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m28.3 µΩ·in
7.9×10⁻⁷ Ω·m31.1 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.1 V
-0.05 V

Corrosion Resistance

60 / 100
80 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

35 / 100
38 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

40%
45%

Weldability

65 / 100
90 / 100

Formability (cold)

65 / 100
82 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

60 / 100
65 / 100

Castability

—
55 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 80 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

53 MJ/kg22,786 BTU/lb
62 MJ/kg26,655 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.8 kg CO₂/kg
4.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

150 L/kg18 gal/lb
140 L/kg16.8 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

55%
60%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

114 kN·m/kg
73 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

24.5 MN·m/kg
25.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

842 kJ/m³
176 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

4.1 mm²/s
3.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

4
3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale301317L

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability301317L
CNC machining—Yes
Default conditionCold RolledSolution Annealed
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall—0.8 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
AlCrN—Yes
AlTiN—Yes
CVD Al2O3—Yes
CVD TiCN—Yes
CVD TiN—Yes
CrN—Yes
DLC—Yes
HVOF Coating—Yes
MoS2—Yes
Multilayer CVD—Yes
TiAlN—Yes
TiB2—Yes
TiCN—Yes
TiN—Yes
WC/C—Yes
ZrN—Yes

Both are offered for Sheet metal. They share 16 finishes: Black Oxide, Cerakote, Chrome Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Nickel Plating, PTFE Coating, Painting, Passivation (Stainless Steel) and 4 more.

301 vs 317L — frequently asked

Is 301 stronger than 317L?

Yes. 301 has a typical yield strength of 570 MPa (82.7 ksi) against 265 MPa (38.4 ksi) for 317L — about 115% more. Tensile strength is 900 MPa (131 ksi) vs 580 MPa (84.1 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 301 or 317L?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, 301 or 317L?

317L. Its weldability rates excellent (90/100) against good (65/100) for 301.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 301 and 317L side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.