FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 301 vs 309Cb

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel 301 and 309Cb are both stainless steel grades. 301 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 570 MPa (82.7 ksi) against 310 MPa (45 ksi) for 309Cb, about 84% more; tensile strength follows at 900 MPa (131 ksi) vs 620 MPa (89.9 ksi). In exchange, 309Cb is the more ductile: elongation 45% versus 25% for 301, and 301 is harder (270 HB vs 165 HB). 309Cb runs hotter in service (1,000°C vs 425°C continuous). On the shop floor, 309Cb welds better (very good vs good).

301Choose it when strength drives the design.

309CbChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

301 vs 309Cb: properties

301309Cb

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

193 GPa28 Msi
200 GPa29 Msi

Bulk Modulus

152 GPa22 Msi
160 GPa23.2 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.28
0.29

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

900 MPa131 ksi
620 MPa89.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

570 MPa82.7 ksi
310 MPa45 ksi

Elongation at Break

25%
45%

Reduction in Area

45%
55%

Compressive Strength

580 MPa84.1 ksi
310 MPa45 ksi

Shear Strength

560 MPa81.2 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

400 MPa58 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

110 MPa·√m100 ksi·√in
180 MPa·√m164 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

60 J44.3 ft·lbf
150 J111 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

270 HB
165 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

100 HRB
85 HRB

Hardness, Rockwell C

27 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

285 HV
—

Same in both: Shear Modulus 77 GPa11.2 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.88 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.98 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,395°C2,543 °F
1,400°C2,552 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,420°C2,588 °F
1,450°C2,642 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

16.2 W/m·K9.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
15.6 W/m·K9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

16.9 µm/m·K9.4 µin/in·°F
14.9 µm/m·K8.3 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

270 J/g116 BTU/lb
285 J/g123 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

425°C797 °F
1,000°C1,832 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

2.4 % IACS
2.2 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

7.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m28.3 µΩ·in
7.8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m30.7 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

60 / 100
66 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.1 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

35 / 100
38 / 100

Weldability

65 / 100
80 / 100

Formability (cold)

65 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
65 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 40% · Brazeability / Solderability 60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

53 MJ/kg22,786 BTU/lb
60 MJ/kg25,795 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.8 kg CO₂/kg
4.8 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

150 L/kg18 gal/lb
200 L/kg24 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

55%
60%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

114 kN·m/kg
78 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

24.5 MN·m/kg
25.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

842 kJ/m³
240 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

4.1 mm²/s
3.9 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

4
3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale301309Cb

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability301309Cb
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionCold Rolled—
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Black OxideYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Passivation (Stainless Steel)Yes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

301 vs 309Cb — frequently asked

Is 301 stronger than 309Cb?

Yes. 301 has a typical yield strength of 570 MPa (82.7 ksi) against 310 MPa (45 ksi) for 309Cb — about 84% more. Tensile strength is 900 MPa (131 ksi) vs 620 MPa (89.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 301 or 309Cb?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, 301 or 309Cb?

309Cb. Its weldability rates very good (80/100) against good (65/100) for 301.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 301 and 309Cb side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.