FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 301 vs 304N

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel 301 and 304N are both stainless steel grades. 301 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 570 MPa (82.7 ksi) against 320 MPa (46.4 ksi) for 304N, about 78% more; tensile strength follows at 900 MPa (131 ksi) vs 650 MPa (94.3 ksi). In exchange, 304N is the more ductile: elongation 50% versus 25% for 301, and 301 is harder (270 HB vs 180 HB). 304N runs hotter in service (760°C vs 425°C continuous). On the shop floor, 304N welds better (excellent vs good) and 304N sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than 301 (premium, $$$).

301Choose it when strength drives the design.

304NChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

301 vs 304N: properties

301304N

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Bulk Modulus

152 GPa22 Msi
140 GPa20.3 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.28
0.29

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

900 MPa131 ksi
650 MPa94.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

570 MPa82.7 ksi
320 MPa46.4 ksi

Elongation at Break

25%
50%

Reduction in Area

45%
65%

Compressive Strength

580 MPa84.1 ksi
320 MPa46.4 ksi

Shear Strength

560 MPa81.2 ksi
435 MPa63.1 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

400 MPa58 ksi
260 MPa37.7 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

110 MPa·√m100 ksi·√in
210 MPa·√m191 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

60 J44.3 ft·lbf
160 J118 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

270 HB
180 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

100 HRB
88 HRB

Hardness, Rockwell C

27 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

285 HV
190 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 193 GPa28 Msi · Shear Modulus 77 GPa11.2 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.88 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.9 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,395°C2,543 °F
1,400°C2,552 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,420°C2,588 °F
1,450°C2,642 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

16.9 µm/m·K9.4 µin/in·°F
17.3 µm/m·K9.6 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

425°C797 °F
760°C1,400 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 16.2 W/m·K9.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Specific Heat Capacity 500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 270 J/g116 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

7.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m28.3 µΩ·in
7.4×10⁻⁷ Ω·m29.1 µΩ·in

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 2.4 % IACS

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.1 V
-0.08 V

Corrosion Resistance

60 / 100
62 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

35 / 100
38 / 100

Weldability

65 / 100
85 / 100

Formability (cold)

65 / 100
78 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

60 / 100
70 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
85 / 100

Castability

—
45 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 40%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

53 MJ/kg22,786 BTU/lb
55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.8 kg CO₂/kg
5.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

150 L/kg18 gal/lb
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

55%
65%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

114 kN·m/kg
82 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

24.5 MN·m/kg
24.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

842 kJ/m³
265 kJ/m³

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

4
3

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 4.1 mm²/s

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale301304N

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability301304N
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionCold Rolled—
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Black OxideYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Passivation (Stainless Steel)Yes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

301 vs 304N — frequently asked

Is 301 stronger than 304N?

Yes. 301 has a typical yield strength of 570 MPa (82.7 ksi) against 320 MPa (46.4 ksi) for 304N — about 78% more. Tensile strength is 900 MPa (131 ksi) vs 650 MPa (94.3 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 301 or 304N?

304N is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while 301 is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, 301 or 304N?

304N. Its weldability rates excellent (85/100) against good (65/100) for 301.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 301 and 304N side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.