FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 1.4855 vs 1.4857

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel 1.4855 and 1.4857 are both stainless steel grades. Both yield at about 250 MPa — strength does not separate them. 1.4855 conducts heat better (15 W/m·K vs 13 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 1.4855 welds better (good vs fair).

1.4855Choose it when it will be welded.

1.4855 vs 1.4857: properties

1.48551.4857

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Bulk Modulus

145 GPa21 Msi
140 GPa20.3 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

470 MPa68.2 ksi
450 MPa65.3 ksi

Reduction in Area

12%
10%

Compressive Strength

260 MPa37.7 ksi
—

Shear Strength

340 MPa49.3 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

190 MPa27.6 ksi
165 MPa23.9 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

55 MPa·√m50.1 ksi·√in
—

Hardness, Vickers

200 HV
—

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 175 GPa25.4 Msi · Shear Modulus 68 GPa9.9 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29 · Yield Strength (0.2% offset) 250 MPa36.3 ksi · Elongation at Break 10% · Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT) 12 J8.9 ft·lbf · Hardness, Brinell 190 HB · Hardness, Rockwell B 91 HRB

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.8 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.9 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,340°C2,444 °F
1,330°C2,426 °F

Same in both: Liquidus Temperature 1,400°C2,552 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

15 W/m·K8.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
13 W/m·K7.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

16.5 µm/m·K9.2 µin/in·°F
15.5 µm/m·K8.6 µin/in·°F

Min Service Temperature

-20°C-4 °F
-50°C-58 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 270 J/g116 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 1,100°C2,012 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

1.9 % IACS
1.7 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

9×10⁻⁷ Ω·m35.4 µΩ·in
1×10⁻⁶ Ω·m39.4 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

62 / 100
65 / 100

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

—
-0.1 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Weldability

55 / 100
45 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
5 / 100

Castability

75 / 100
70 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

40 / 100
30 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 25 / 100 · Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 15% · Polishability 45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb
90 MJ/kg38,693 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.5 kg CO₂/kg
6.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

120 L/kg14.4 gal/lb
220 L/kg26.4 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

70%
60%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

60 kN·m/kg
57 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

22.4 MN·m/kg
22.2 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

3.8 mm²/s
3.3 mm²/s

Same in both: Modulus of Resilience 179 kJ/m³ · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 2

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale1.48551.4857

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability1.48551.4857
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

1.4855 vs 1.4857 — frequently asked

What is the difference between 1.4855 and 1.4857?

Stainless Steel 1.4855 and 1.4857 are both stainless steel grades. Both yield at about 250 MPa — strength does not separate them. 1.4855 conducts heat better (15 W/m·K vs 13 W/m·K).

Which is cheaper, 1.4855 or 1.4857?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, 1.4855 or 1.4857?

1.4855. Its weldability rates good (55/100) against fair (45/100) for 1.4857.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1.4855 and 1.4857 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.