FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 1.4848 vs HL

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel 1.4848 and HL are both stainless steel grades. HL is the stronger of the two: yield strength 340 MPa (49.3 ksi) against 280 MPa (40.6 ksi) for 1.4848, about 21% more; tensile strength follows at 565 MPa (81.9 ksi) vs 530 MPa (76.9 ksi). On the shop floor, 1.4848 sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than HL (high, $$$$).

1.4848Choose it when cost is the deciding factor.

HLChoose it when strength drives the design.

1.4848 vs HL: properties

1.4848HL

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

185 GPa26.8 Msi
180 GPa26.1 Msi

Shear Modulus

72 GPa10.4 Msi
69 GPa10 Msi

Bulk Modulus

147 GPa21.3 Msi
150 GPa21.8 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

530 MPa76.9 ksi
565 MPa81.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

280 MPa40.6 ksi
340 MPa49.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

14%
15%

Reduction in Area

15%
18%

Shear Strength

345 MPa50 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

200 MPa29 ksi
205 MPa29.7 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

12 J8.9 ft·lbf
22 J16.2 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

190 HB
192 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

90 HRB
92 HRB

Compressive Strength

—
350 MPa50.8 ksi

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.29 · Hardness, Vickers 200 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.75 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.7 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,370°C2,498 °F
1,340°C2,444 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,425°C2,597 °F
1,400°C2,552 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

14 W/m·K8.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
13.5 W/m·K7.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

15 µm/m·K8.3 µin/in·°F
15.5 µm/m·K8.6 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

1,100°C2,012 °F
1,150°C2,102 °F

Min Service Temperature

-50°C-58 °F
-30°C-22 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 270 J/g116 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

1.9 % IACS
1.8 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

9×10⁻⁷ Ω·m35.4 µΩ·in
9.8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m38.6 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

58 / 100
62 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.1 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

25 / 100
28 / 100

Weldability

45 / 100
40 / 100

Formability (cold)

8 / 100
10 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 25% · Castability 75 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 30 / 100 · Polishability 45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

200 L/kg24 gal/lb
130 L/kg15.6 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

75%
70%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 62 MJ/kg26,655 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 4.6 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

68 kN·m/kg
73 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

23.9 MN·m/kg
23.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

212 kJ/m³
321 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3.6 mm²/s
3.5 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale1.4848HL

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability1.4848HL
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

1.4848 vs HL — frequently asked

Is HL stronger than 1.4848?

Yes. HL has a typical yield strength of 340 MPa (49.3 ksi) against 280 MPa (40.6 ksi) for 1.4848 — about 21% more. Tensile strength is 565 MPa (81.9 ksi) vs 530 MPa (76.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 1.4848 or HL?

1.4848 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while HL is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, 1.4848 or HL?

1.4848. Its weldability rates fair (45/100) against fair (40/100) for HL.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1.4848 and HL side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.