FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 1.4848 vs HF

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel 1.4848 and HF are both stainless steel grades. HF is the stronger of the two: yield strength 310 MPa (45 ksi) against 280 MPa (40.6 ksi) for 1.4848, about 11% more; tensile strength follows at 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) vs 530 MPa (76.9 ksi). HF is the more ductile: elongation 38% versus 14% for 1.4848, and 1.4848 is harder (190 HB vs 165 HB). 1.4848 runs hotter in service (1,100°C vs 870°C continuous) and HF conducts electricity better (2.2 % IACS vs 1.9 % IACS).

1.4848Choose it when the part sees heat.

HFChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

1.4848 vs HF: properties

1.4848HF

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

185 GPa26.8 Msi
193 GPa28 Msi

Shear Modulus

72 GPa10.4 Msi
74 GPa10.7 Msi

Bulk Modulus

147 GPa21.3 Msi
145 GPa21 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

530 MPa76.9 ksi
620 MPa89.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

280 MPa40.6 ksi
310 MPa45 ksi

Elongation at Break

14%
38%

Reduction in Area

15%
35%

Shear Strength

345 MPa50 ksi
380 MPa55.1 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

200 MPa29 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

12 J8.9 ft·lbf
90 J66.4 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

190 HB
165 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

90 HRB
85 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

200 HV
—

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.29

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,370°C2,498 °F
1,400°C2,552 °F

Same in both: Density 7.75 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³ · Liquidus Temperature 1,425°C2,597 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

14 W/m·K8.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
14.2 W/m·K8.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

15 µm/m·K8.3 µin/in·°F
17.3 µm/m·K9.6 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

1,100°C2,012 °F
870°C1,598 °F

Min Service Temperature

-50°C-58 °F
-100°C-148 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 270 J/g116 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

1.9 % IACS
2.2 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

9×10⁻⁷ Ω·m35.4 µΩ·in
8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m31.5 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

58 / 100
55 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.1 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

25 / 100
30 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

25%
35%

Weldability

45 / 100
50 / 100

Formability (cold)

8 / 100
10 / 100

Castability

75 / 100
80 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

30 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
50 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

62 MJ/kg26,655 BTU/lb
53 MJ/kg22,786 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.6 kg CO₂/kg
4.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

200 L/kg24 gal/lb
130 L/kg15.6 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 75%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

68 kN·m/kg
80 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

23.9 MN·m/kg
24.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

212 kJ/m³
249 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3.6 mm²/s
3.7 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale1.4848HF

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability1.4848HF
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

1.4848 vs HF — frequently asked

Is HF stronger than 1.4848?

Yes. HF has a typical yield strength of 310 MPa (45 ksi) against 280 MPa (40.6 ksi) for 1.4848 — about 11% more. Tensile strength is 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) vs 530 MPa (76.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 1.4848 or HF?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 1.4848 or HF?

HF, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 30/100 against 25/100 for 1.4848; for welding the order is HF first (fair, 50/100) then 1.4848 (fair, 45/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1.4848 and HF side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.