FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 1.4598 vs 301

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel 1.4598 and 301 are both stainless steel grades. 301 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 570 MPa (82.7 ksi) against 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) for 1.4598, about 138% more; tensile strength follows at 900 MPa (131 ksi) vs 580 MPa (84.1 ksi). In exchange, 1.4598 is the more ductile: elongation 35% versus 25% for 301, and 301 is harder (270 HB vs 165 HB). On the shop floor, 1.4598 machines more easily (good vs fair) and 301 welds better (good vs poor).

1.4598Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

301Choose it when strength drives the design, or when it will be welded.

1.4598 vs 301: properties

1.4598301

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

200 GPa29 Msi
193 GPa28 Msi

Bulk Modulus

160 GPa23.2 Msi
152 GPa22 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.28

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

580 MPa84.1 ksi
900 MPa131 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

240 MPa34.8 ksi
570 MPa82.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

35%
25%

Reduction in Area

55%
45%

Compressive Strength

240 MPa34.8 ksi
580 MPa84.1 ksi

Shear Strength

400 MPa58 ksi
560 MPa81.2 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

230 MPa33.4 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

130 MPa·√m118 ksi·√in
110 MPa·√m100 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

65 J47.9 ft·lbf
60 J44.3 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

165 HB
270 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

84 HRB
100 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

175 HV
285 HV

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
27 HRC

Same in both: Shear Modulus 77 GPa11.2 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³
7.88 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,380°C2,516 °F
1,395°C2,543 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,425°C2,597 °F
1,420°C2,588 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

15 W/m·K8.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
16.2 W/m·K9.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

16.5 µm/m·K9.2 µin/in·°F
16.9 µm/m·K9.4 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

280 J/g120 BTU/lb
270 J/g116 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

400°C752 °F
425°C797 °F

Min Service Temperature

-100°C-148 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

2.3 % IACS
2.4 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

7.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m29.5 µΩ·in
7.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m28.3 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

70 / 100
60 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.1 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

68 / 100
35 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

75%
40%

Weldability

30 / 100
65 / 100

Formability (cold)

50 / 100
65 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

55 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

35 / 100
80 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb
53 MJ/kg22,786 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.8 kg CO₂/kg
5.8 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

210 L/kg25.2 gal/lb
150 L/kg18 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

65%
55%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

73 kN·m/kg
114 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25 MN·m/kg
24.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

144 kJ/m³
842 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3.8 mm²/s
4.1 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

3
4

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale3011.4598

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability1.4598301
Sheet metal—Yes
Default condition—Cold Rolled
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Black Oxide—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chrome Plating—Yes
Electropolishing—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Passivation (Stainless Steel)—Yes
Powder Coating—Yes

They share 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

1.4598 vs 301 — frequently asked

Is 301 stronger than 1.4598?

Yes. 301 has a typical yield strength of 570 MPa (82.7 ksi) against 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) for 1.4598 — about 138% more. Tensile strength is 900 MPa (131 ksi) vs 580 MPa (84.1 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 1.4598 or 301?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 1.4598 or 301?

1.4598. Its machinability rates good (68/100) against fair (35/100) for 301; for welding the order is 301 first (good, 65/100) then 1.4598 (poor, 30/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1.4598 and 301 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.