FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 1.4518 vs CD4MCuN

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel 1.4518 and CD4MCuN are both stainless steel grades. CD4MCuN is the stronger of the two: yield strength 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) against 260 MPa (37.7 ksi) for 1.4518, about 112% more; tensile strength follows at 730 MPa (106 ksi) vs 530 MPa (76.9 ksi). In exchange, 1.4518 is the more ductile: elongation 48% versus 25% for CD4MCuN, and CD4MCuN is harder (250 HB vs 150 HB). 1.4518 runs hotter in service (550°C vs 300°C continuous). On the shop floor, 1.4518 machines more easily (fair vs poor) and 1.4518 welds better (excellent vs good).

1.4518Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

CD4MCuNChoose it when strength drives the design.

1.4518 vs CD4MCuN: properties

1.4518CD4MCuN

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

195 GPa28.3 Msi
200 GPa29 Msi

Bulk Modulus

160 GPa23.2 Msi
145 GPa21 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

530 MPa76.9 ksi
730 MPa106 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

260 MPa37.7 ksi
550 MPa79.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

48%
25%

Reduction in Area

55%
40%

Compressive Strength

260 MPa37.7 ksi
560 MPa81.2 ksi

Shear Strength

380 MPa55.1 ksi
450 MPa65.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

230 MPa33.4 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

170 MPa·√m155 ksi·√in
90 MPa·√m81.9 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

120 J88.5 ft·lbf
70 J51.6 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

150 HB
250 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

80 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

158 HV
262 HV

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
24 HRC

Same in both: Shear Modulus 77 GPa11.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.3

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.9 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³
7.75 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,385°C2,525 °F
1,410°C2,570 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,440°C2,624 °F
1,450°C2,642 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

15 W/m·K8.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
16 W/m·K9.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F
480 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

16.2 µm/m·K9 µin/in·°F
12 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

550°C1,022 °F
300°C572 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-50°C-58 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 270 J/g116 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

2.3 % IACS
2.2 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

7.6×10⁻⁷ Ω·m29.9 µΩ·in
8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m31.5 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.08 V
-0.15 V

Corrosion Resistance

72 / 100
78 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

40 / 100
30 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

45%
25%

Weldability

88 / 100
55 / 100

Formability (cold)

25 / 100
15 / 100

Castability

68 / 100
65 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

55 / 100
35 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
65 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb
53 MJ/kg22,786 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5 kg CO₂/kg
4.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

190 L/kg22.8 gal/lb
120 L/kg14.4 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

75%
70%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

67 kN·m/kg
94 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

24.7 MN·m/kg
25.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

173 kJ/m³
756 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3.8 mm²/s
4.3 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

3
5

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleCD4MCuN1.4518

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability1.4518CD4MCuN
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

1.4518 vs CD4MCuN — frequently asked

Is CD4MCuN stronger than 1.4518?

Yes. CD4MCuN has a typical yield strength of 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) against 260 MPa (37.7 ksi) for 1.4518 — about 112% more. Tensile strength is 730 MPa (106 ksi) vs 530 MPa (76.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 1.4518 or CD4MCuN?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 1.4518 or CD4MCuN?

1.4518. Its machinability rates fair (40/100) against poor (30/100) for CD4MCuN; for welding the order is 1.4518 first (excellent, 88/100) then CD4MCuN (good, 55/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1.4518 and CD4MCuN side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.