FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 1.4417 vs CD4MCuN

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel 1.4417 and CD4MCuN are both stainless steel grades. Both yield at about 560 MPa — strength does not separate them. 1.4417 is the more ductile: elongation 28% versus 25% for CD4MCuN. On the shop floor, CD4MCuN sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than 1.4417 (high, $$$$).

1.4417Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

CD4MCuNChoose it when cost is the deciding factor.

1.4417 vs CD4MCuN: properties

1.4417CD4MCuN

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

195 GPa28.3 Msi
200 GPa29 Msi

Bulk Modulus

160 GPa23.2 Msi
145 GPa21 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

760 MPa110 ksi
730 MPa106 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

560 MPa81.2 ksi
550 MPa79.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

28%
25%

Reduction in Area

45%
40%

Compressive Strength

570 MPa82.7 ksi
560 MPa81.2 ksi

Shear Strength

470 MPa68.2 ksi
450 MPa65.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

320 MPa46.4 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

110 J81.1 ft·lbf
70 J51.6 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

255 HB
250 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

25 HRC
24 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

270 HV
262 HV

Same in both: Shear Modulus 77 GPa11.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.3 · Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 90 MPa·√m81.9 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.8 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.75 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,350°C2,462 °F
1,410°C2,570 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,440°C2,624 °F
1,450°C2,642 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

15 W/m·K8.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
16 W/m·K9.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

13 µm/m·K7.2 µin/in·°F
12 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

260 J/g112 BTU/lb
270 J/g116 BTU/lb

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 480 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 300°C572 °F · Min Service Temperature -50°C-58 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 2.2 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m31.5 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

86 / 100
78 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.15 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

22 / 100
30 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

20%
25%

Weldability

60 / 100
55 / 100

Formability (cold)

20 / 100
15 / 100

Castability

62 / 100
65 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
65 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 35 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

60 MJ/kg25,795 BTU/lb
53 MJ/kg22,786 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

130 L/kg15.6 gal/lb
120 L/kg14.4 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 4.6 kg CO₂/kg · Typical Recycled Content 70%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

97 kN·m/kg
94 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25 MN·m/kg
25.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

804 kJ/m³
756 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

4 mm²/s
4.3 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

4
5

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleCD4MCuN1.4417

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability1.4417CD4MCuN
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

1.4417 vs CD4MCuN — frequently asked

What is the difference between 1.4417 and CD4MCuN?

Stainless Steel 1.4417 and CD4MCuN are both stainless steel grades. Both yield at about 560 MPa — strength does not separate them. 1.4417 is the more ductile: elongation 28% versus 25% for CD4MCuN.

Which is cheaper, 1.4417 or CD4MCuN?

CD4MCuN is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while 1.4417 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 1.4417 or CD4MCuN?

CD4MCuN, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 30/100 against 22/100 for 1.4417; for welding the order is 1.4417 first (good, 60/100) then CD4MCuN (good, 55/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1.4417 and CD4MCuN side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.