FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 1.4477 vs 2304

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel 1.4477 and 2304 are both stainless steel grades. 1.4477 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 700 MPa (102 ksi) against 460 MPa (66.7 ksi) for 2304, about 52% more; tensile strength follows at 880 MPa (128 ksi) vs 680 MPa (98.6 ksi). 1.4477 is harder — 270 HB against 240 HB for 2304 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. On the shop floor, 2304 machines more easily (fair vs poor), 2304 forms better (good vs fair), and 2304 sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than 1.4477 (high, $$$$).

1.4477Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

2304Choose it when the part is machined in volume, or when cost is the deciding factor.

1.4477 vs 2304: properties

1.44772304

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Bulk Modulus

162 GPa23.5 Msi
150 GPa21.8 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

880 MPa128 ksi
680 MPa98.6 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

700 MPa102 ksi
460 MPa66.7 ksi

Reduction in Area

60%
55%

Compressive Strength

700 MPa102 ksi
470 MPa68.2 ksi

Shear Strength

530 MPa76.9 ksi
420 MPa60.9 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

130 MPa·√m118 ksi·√in
120 MPa·√m109 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

130 J95.9 ft·lbf
220 J162 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

270 HB
240 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

27 HRC
22 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

285 HV
250 HV

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
99 HRB

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 200 GPa29 Msi · Shear Modulus 77 GPa11.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.3 · Elongation at Break 30% · Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit) 400 MPa58 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.8 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.75 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,350°C2,462 °F
1,385°C2,525 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,440°C2,624 °F
1,445°C2,633 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

15 W/m·K8.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
16 W/m·K9.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

12.5 µm/m·K6.9 µin/in·°F
13 µm/m·K7.2 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

270 J/g116 BTU/lb
275 J/g118 BTU/lb

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 480 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 300°C572 °F · Min Service Temperature -50°C-58 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

2 % IACS
2.2 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

8.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m33.5 µΩ·in
8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m31.5 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

88 / 100
74 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.15 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

25 / 100
35 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

18%
40%

Weldability

65 / 100
72 / 100

Formability (cold)

45 / 100
55 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

30 / 100
40 / 100

Polishability

75 / 100
70 / 100

Castability

—
45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

62 MJ/kg26,655 BTU/lb
46 MJ/kg19,776 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.6 kg CO₂/kg
3.8 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

130 L/kg15.6 gal/lb
100 L/kg12 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

55%
70%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

113 kN·m/kg
88 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.6 MN·m/kg
25.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,225 kJ/m³
529 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

4 mm²/s
4.3 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

5
4

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale1.44772304

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability1.44772304
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Default condition—Solution Annealed
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall—0.8 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
AlCrN—Yes
AlTiN—Yes
Black Oxide—Yes
CVD Al2O3—Yes
CVD TiCN—Yes
CVD TiN—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chrome Plating—Yes
CrN—Yes
DLC—Yes
Electropolishing—Yes
HVOF Coating—Yes
MoS2—Yes
Multilayer CVD—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Passivation (Stainless Steel)—Yes

They share 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

1.4477 vs 2304 — frequently asked

Is 1.4477 stronger than 2304?

Yes. 1.4477 has a typical yield strength of 700 MPa (102 ksi) against 460 MPa (66.7 ksi) for 2304 — about 52% more. Tensile strength is 880 MPa (128 ksi) vs 680 MPa (98.6 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 1.4477 or 2304?

2304 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while 1.4477 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 1.4477 or 2304?

2304. Its machinability rates fair (35/100) against poor (25/100) for 1.4477; for welding the order is 2304 first (very good, 72/100) then 1.4477 (good, 65/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1.4477 and 2304 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.