FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 1.4469 vs CE8MN

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel 1.4469 and CE8MN are both stainless steel grades. 1.4469 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) against 500 MPa (72.5 ksi) for CE8MN, about 10% more; tensile strength follows at 760 MPa (110 ksi) vs 720 MPa (104 ksi). 1.4469 is harder — 250 HB against 210 HB for CE8MN — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. CE8MN runs hotter in service (315°C vs 260°C continuous). On the shop floor, CE8MN sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than 1.4469 (high, $$$$).

1.4469Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

CE8MNChoose it when the part sees heat, or when cost is the deciding factor.

1.4469 vs CE8MN: properties

1.4469CE8MN

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

200 GPa29 Msi
195 GPa28.3 Msi

Shear Modulus

77 GPa11.2 Msi
76 GPa11 Msi

Bulk Modulus

160 GPa23.2 Msi
162 GPa23.5 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

760 MPa110 ksi
720 MPa104 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

550 MPa79.8 ksi
500 MPa72.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

28%
30%

Reduction in Area

45%
40%

Compressive Strength

560 MPa81.2 ksi
500 MPa72.5 ksi

Shear Strength

460 MPa66.7 ksi
430 MPa62.4 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

330 MPa47.9 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

110 MPa·√m100 ksi·√in
100 MPa·√m91 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

90 J66.4 ft·lbf
80 J59 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

250 HB
210 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

100 HRB
—

Hardness, Rockwell C

24 HRC
20 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

260 HV
—

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.3

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.8 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.75 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,350°C2,462 °F
1,400°C2,552 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,440°C2,624 °F
1,450°C2,642 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Specific Heat Capacity

480 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
490 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

12.5 µm/m·K6.9 µin/in·°F
13 µm/m·K7.2 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

260 J/g112 BTU/lb
270 J/g116 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

260°C500 °F
315°C599 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 15 W/m·K8.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Min Service Temperature -50°C-58 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

2 % IACS
2.2 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

8.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m33.5 µΩ·in
8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m31.5 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

0.1 V
-0.2 V

Corrosion Resistance

80 / 100
72 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

28 / 100
32 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

20%
30%

Weldability

60 / 100
65 / 100

Formability (cold)

25 / 100
30 / 100

Castability

62 / 100
65 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 35 / 100 · Polishability 65 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb
60 MJ/kg25,795 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.6 kg CO₂/kg
5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

90 L/kg10.8 gal/lb
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

60%
80%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

97 kN·m/kg
93 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.6 MN·m/kg
25.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

756 kJ/m³
641 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

4 mm²/s
3.9 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

5
4

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleCE8MN1.4469

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability1.4469CE8MN
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

1.4469 vs CE8MN — frequently asked

Is 1.4469 stronger than CE8MN?

Yes. 1.4469 has a typical yield strength of 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) against 500 MPa (72.5 ksi) for CE8MN — about 10% more. Tensile strength is 760 MPa (110 ksi) vs 720 MPa (104 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 1.4469 or CE8MN?

CE8MN is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while 1.4469 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, 1.4469 or CE8MN?

CE8MN. Its weldability rates good (65/100) against good (60/100) for 1.4469.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1.4469 and CE8MN side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.