FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 1.4301 vs 301

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel 1.4301 and 301 are both stainless steel grades. 301 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 570 MPa (82.7 ksi) against 260 MPa (37.7 ksi) for 1.4301, about 119% more; tensile strength follows at 900 MPa (131 ksi) vs 600 MPa (87 ksi). In exchange, 1.4301 is the more ductile: elongation 55% versus 25% for 301, and 301 is harder (270 HB vs 155 HB). 1.4301 runs hotter in service (870°C vs 425°C continuous). On the shop floor, 1.4301 welds better (excellent vs good) and 1.4301 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than 301 (premium, $$$).

1.4301Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

301Choose it when strength drives the design.

1.4301 vs 301: properties

1.4301301

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

200 GPa29 Msi
193 GPa28 Msi

Bulk Modulus

140 GPa20.3 Msi
152 GPa22 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.29
0.28

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

600 MPa87 ksi
900 MPa131 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

260 MPa37.7 ksi
570 MPa82.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

55%
25%

Reduction in Area

68%
45%

Shear Strength

430 MPa62.4 ksi
560 MPa81.2 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

200 MPa·√m182 ksi·√in
110 MPa·√m100 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

140 J103 ft·lbf
60 J44.3 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

155 HB
270 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

80 HRB
100 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

165 HV
285 HV

Compressive Strength

—
580 MPa84.1 ksi

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
27 HRC

Same in both: Shear Modulus 77 GPa11.2 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.9 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³
7.88 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,400°C2,552 °F
1,395°C2,543 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,450°C2,642 °F
1,420°C2,588 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

15 W/m·K8.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
16.2 W/m·K9.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

16 µm/m·K8.9 µin/in·°F
16.9 µm/m·K9.4 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

275 J/g118 BTU/lb
270 J/g116 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

870°C1,598 °F
425°C797 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

7.3×10⁻⁷ Ω·m28.7 µΩ·in
7.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m28.3 µΩ·in

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 2.4 % IACS

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.08 V
-0.1 V

Corrosion Resistance

65 / 100
60 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

42 / 100
35 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

45%
40%

Weldability

90 / 100
65 / 100

Formability (cold)

92 / 100
65 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

65 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

88 / 100
80 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.2 kg CO₂/kg
5.8 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

160 L/kg19.2 gal/lb
150 L/kg18 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

65%
55%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 53 MJ/kg22,786 BTU/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

76 kN·m/kg
114 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.3 MN·m/kg
24.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

169 kJ/m³
842 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3.8 mm²/s
4.1 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

3
4

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale3011.4301

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability1.4301301
Sheet metal—Yes
Default condition—Cold Rolled
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Black Oxide—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chrome Plating—Yes
Electropolishing—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Passivation (Stainless Steel)—Yes
Powder Coating—Yes

They share 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

1.4301 vs 301 — frequently asked

Is 301 stronger than 1.4301?

Yes. 301 has a typical yield strength of 570 MPa (82.7 ksi) against 260 MPa (37.7 ksi) for 1.4301 — about 119% more. Tensile strength is 900 MPa (131 ksi) vs 600 MPa (87 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 1.4301 or 301?

1.4301 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while 301 is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 1.4301 or 301?

1.4301, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 42/100 against 35/100 for 301; for welding the order is 1.4301 first (excellent, 90/100) then 301 (good, 65/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1.4301 and 301 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.