Solder & Low-Melting Alloy Sn63Pb37Sb vs Sn95Cu4Ag1
Solder & Low-Melting Alloy · grade comparison
Solder & Low-Melting Alloy Sn63Pb37Sb and Sn95Cu4Ag1 are both solder & low-melting alloy grades. Sn63Pb37Sb is the stronger of the two: yield strength 38 MPa (5.51 ksi) against 32 MPa (4.64 ksi) for Sn95Cu4Ag1, about 19% more; tensile strength follows at 58 MPa (8.41 ksi) vs 48 MPa (6.96 ksi). Sn63Pb37Sb is the more ductile: elongation 32% versus 25% for Sn95Cu4Ag1, and Sn95Cu4Ag1 is harder (18 HB vs 16 HB). Sn95Cu4Ag1 is lighter (7.35 g/cm³ vs 8.4 g/cm³ for Sn63Pb37Sb) and Sn95Cu4Ag1 is stiffer (48 GPa vs 32 GPa). On the shop floor, Sn95Cu4Ag1 machines more easily (30 vs 20 out of 100).
Sn63Pb37SbChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.
Sn95Cu4Ag1Choose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part sees heat.
Sn63Pb37Sb vs Sn95Cu4Ag1: propertiesHow to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all solder & low-melting alloy grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
How to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all solder & low-melting alloy grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
Mechanical
Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.
Elastic (Young's) Modulus
Shear Modulus
Bulk Modulus
Poisson's Ratio
Tensile Strength (Ultimate)
Yield Strength (0.2% offset)
Elongation at Break
Shear Strength
Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)
Hardness, Brinell
Compressive Strength
Physical
Density and transition temperatures.
Density
Melting Point (Solidus)
Liquidus Temperature
Thermal
How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.
Thermal Conductivity
Specific Heat Capacity
Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)
Latent Heat of Fusion
Max Service Temperature (continuous)
Same in both: Min Service Temperature -55°C-67 °F
Electrical
Conductivity and insulation.
Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 11.5 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 1.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m5.91 µΩ·in
Chemical & Environmental
Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).
Corrosion Resistance
Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.5 V
Manufacturability
FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.
Machinability
Castability
Brazeability / Solderability
Same in both: Weldability 20 / 100 · Formability (cold) 90 / 100 · Polishability 25 / 100
Sustainability
Primary-production footprint per kilogram.
Embodied Energy (primary production)
Embodied Carbon (primary production)
Embodied Water
Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 30%
Common Calculations
Ratios derived from the values above.
Specific Stiffness (E / density)
Modulus of Resilience
Thermal Diffusivity
Thermal Shock Resistance Index
Same in both: Specific Strength (UTS / density) 7 kN·m/kg
Strength versus weight
Yield strength against density for every solder & low-melting alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.
Manufacturing and finishing
| Capability | Sn63Pb37Sb | Sn95Cu4Ag1 |
|---|---|---|
| Default condition | — | — |
| Relative cost | $$$$ High | $$$$ High |
| Min. machined wall | — | — |
| Best machined surface | — | — |
Sn63Pb37Sb vs Sn95Cu4Ag1 — frequently asked
Is Sn63Pb37Sb stronger than Sn95Cu4Ag1?
Yes. Sn63Pb37Sb has a typical yield strength of 38 MPa (5.51 ksi) against 32 MPa (4.64 ksi) for Sn95Cu4Ag1 — about 19% more. Tensile strength is 58 MPa (8.41 ksi) vs 48 MPa (6.96 ksi).
Which is cheaper, Sn63Pb37Sb or Sn95Cu4Ag1?
Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.
Which is easier to machine, Sn63Pb37Sb or Sn95Cu4Ag1?
Sn95Cu4Ag1, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 30/100 against 20/100 for Sn63Pb37Sb.
Ready to make it?
Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Sn63Pb37Sb and Sn95Cu4Ag1 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.
Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.