FabDigitFabDigit

Solder & Low-Melting Alloy Sn5Pb95 vs Sn60Pb40E

Solder & Low-Melting Alloy · grade comparison

Solder & Low-Melting Alloy Sn5Pb95 and Sn60Pb40E are both solder & low-melting alloy grades. Sn60Pb40E is the stronger of the two: yield strength 30 MPa (4.35 ksi) against 12 MPa (1.74 ksi) for Sn5Pb95, about 150% more; tensile strength follows at 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) vs 24 MPa (3.48 ksi). In exchange, Sn5Pb95 is the more ductile: elongation 45% versus 35% for Sn60Pb40E, and Sn60Pb40E is harder (16 HB vs 8 HB). Sn60Pb40E is lighter (8.5 g/cm³ vs 11 g/cm³ for Sn5Pb95) and Sn60Pb40E is stiffer (30 GPa vs 16 GPa).

Sn5Pb95Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

Sn60Pb40EChoose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

Sn5Pb95 vs Sn60Pb40E: properties

Sn5Pb95Sn60Pb40E

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

16 GPa2.3 Msi
30 GPa4.4 Msi

Shear Modulus

5.6 GPa0.81 Msi
11 GPa1.6 Msi

Bulk Modulus

43 GPa6.2 Msi
48 GPa7 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.42
0.4

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

24 MPa3.5 ksi
50 MPa7.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

12 MPa1.7 ksi
30 MPa4.4 ksi

Elongation at Break

45%
35%

Shear Strength

15 MPa2.2 ksi
34 MPa4.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

8 MPa1.2 ksi
20 MPa2.9 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

8 HB
16 HB

Hardness, Vickers

—
14 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

11 g/cm³0.4 lb/in³
8.5 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

308°C586 °F
183°C361 °F

Liquidus Temperature

312°C594 °F
190°C374 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

30 W/m·K17.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
50 W/m·K28.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

135 J/kg·K0.03 BTU/lb·°F
180 J/kg·K0.04 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

29 µm/m·K16.1 µin/in·°F
24.5 µm/m·K13.6 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

25 J/g10.7 BTU/lb
42 J/g18.1 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

175°C347 °F
100°C212 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -55°C-67 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

8.2 % IACS
11.5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.1×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.27 µΩ·in
1.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m5.91 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.52 V
-0.5 V

Corrosion Resistance

45 / 100
40 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

25 / 100
30 / 100

Formability (cold)

95 / 100
90 / 100

Castability

85 / 100
92 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

70 / 100
100 / 100

Weldability

—
20 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 20 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

42 MJ/kg18,057 BTU/lb
200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.6 kg CO₂/kg
10.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

90 L/kg10.8 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

55%
15%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

2 kN·m/kg
6 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1.5 MN·m/kg
3.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

5 kJ/m³
15 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

20.2 mm²/s
32.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

2
3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every solder & low-melting alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

125102050891011Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleSn60Pb40ESn5Pb95

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilitySn5Pb95Sn60Pb40E
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Sn5Pb95 vs Sn60Pb40E — frequently asked

Is Sn60Pb40E stronger than Sn5Pb95?

Yes. Sn60Pb40E has a typical yield strength of 30 MPa (4.35 ksi) against 12 MPa (1.74 ksi) for Sn5Pb95 — about 150% more. Tensile strength is 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) vs 24 MPa (3.48 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Sn5Pb95 or Sn60Pb40E?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, Sn5Pb95 or Sn60Pb40E?

Sn60Pb40E, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 30/100 against 25/100 for Sn5Pb95.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Sn5Pb95 and Sn60Pb40E side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.