FabDigitFabDigit

Solder & Low-Melting Alloy In52Sn48 vs Rose's Metal

Solder & Low-Melting Alloy · grade comparison

Solder & Low-Melting Alloy In52Sn48 and Rose's Metal are both solder & low-melting alloy grades. Rose's Metal is the stronger of the two: yield strength 18 MPa (2.61 ksi) against 7 MPa (1.02 ksi) for In52Sn48, about 157% more; tensile strength follows at 30 MPa (4.35 ksi) vs 12 MPa (1.73 ksi). In exchange, In52Sn48 is the more ductile: elongation 60% versus 25% for Rose's Metal, and Rose's Metal is harder (11 HB vs 5 HB). In52Sn48 is lighter (7.3 g/cm³ vs 9.7 g/cm³ for Rose's Metal) and Rose's Metal is stiffer (25 GPa vs 20 GPa). On the shop floor, Rose's Metal machines more easily (30 vs 20 out of 100).

In52Sn48Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

Rose's MetalChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

In52Sn48 vs Rose's Metal: properties

In52Sn48Rose's Metal

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

20 GPa2.9 Msi
25 GPa3.6 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.4
0.35

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

12 MPa1.7 ksi
30 MPa4.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

7 MPa1 ksi
18 MPa2.6 ksi

Elongation at Break

60%
25%

Shear Strength

11 MPa1.6 ksi
22 MPa3.2 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

5 HB
11 HB

Shear Modulus

—
9.5 GPa1.4 Msi

Bulk Modulus

—
33 GPa4.8 Msi

Compressive Strength

—
55 MPa8 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.3 g/cm³0.26 lb/in³
9.7 g/cm³0.35 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

118°C244 °F
98°C208 °F

Liquidus Temperature

118°C244 °F
110°C230 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

34 W/m·K19.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
16 W/m·K9.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

200 J/kg·K0.05 BTU/lb·°F
167 J/kg·K0.04 BTU/lb·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

28 J/g12 BTU/lb
36 J/g15.5 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

60°C140 °F
45°C113 °F

Min Service Temperature

-269°C-452 °F
-50°C-58 °F

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 20 µm/m·K11.1 µin/in·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

11.7 % IACS
2.7 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.47×10⁻⁷ Ω·m5.79 µΩ·in
6.4×10⁻⁷ Ω·m25.2 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.55 V
-0.5 V

Corrosion Resistance

45 / 100
40 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

20 / 100
30 / 100

Weldability

10 / 100
15 / 100

Formability (cold)

95 / 100
80 / 100

Castability

90 / 100
95 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

98 / 100
90 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

—
35%

Polishability

—
30 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

1,600 MJ/kg687,877 BTU/lb
120 MJ/kg51,591 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

105 kg CO₂/kg
8 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

30%
45%

Embodied Water

—
400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

2 kN·m/kg
3 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.7 MN·m/kg
2.6 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1 kJ/m³
6 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

23.3 mm²/s
9.9 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 1

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every solder & low-melting alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

125102050891011Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleIn52Sn48Rose's Metal

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityIn52Sn48Rose's Metal
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

In52Sn48 vs Rose's Metal — frequently asked

Is Rose's Metal stronger than In52Sn48?

Yes. Rose's Metal has a typical yield strength of 18 MPa (2.61 ksi) against 7 MPa (1.02 ksi) for In52Sn48 — about 157% more. Tensile strength is 30 MPa (4.35 ksi) vs 12 MPa (1.73 ksi).

Which is cheaper, In52Sn48 or Rose's Metal?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, In52Sn48 or Rose's Metal?

Rose's Metal, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 30/100 against 20/100 for In52Sn48; for welding the order is Rose's Metal first (poor, 15/100) then In52Sn48 (not recommended, 10/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in In52Sn48 and Rose's Metal side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.