FabDigitFabDigit

Solder & Low-Melting Alloy Babbitt Grade 2 (Tin-Base) vs Britannia Metal

Solder & Low-Melting Alloy · grade comparison

Solder & Low-Melting Alloy Babbitt Grade 2 (Tin-Base) and Britannia Metal are both solder & low-melting alloy grades. Babbitt Grade 2 (Tin-Base) is the stronger of the two: yield strength 42 MPa (6.09 ksi) against 28 MPa (4.06 ksi) for Britannia Metal, about 50% more; tensile strength follows at 66 MPa (9.57 ksi) vs 60 MPa (8.7 ksi). In exchange, Britannia Metal is the more ductile: elongation 25% versus 3% for Babbitt Grade 2 (Tin-Base), and Babbitt Grade 2 (Tin-Base) is harder (25 HB vs 23 HB). Babbitt Grade 2 (Tin-Base) is stiffer (53 GPa vs 50 GPa) and Babbitt Grade 2 (Tin-Base) runs hotter in service (120°C vs 100°C continuous). On the shop floor, Babbitt Grade 2 (Tin-Base) machines more easily (excellent vs good) and Britannia Metal welds better (30 vs 20 out of 100).

Babbitt Grade 2 (Tin-Base)Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

Britannia MetalChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

Babbitt Grade 2 (Tin-Base) vs Britannia Metal: properties

Babbitt Grade 2 (Tin-Base)Britannia Metal

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

53 GPa7.7 Msi
50 GPa7.3 Msi

Shear Modulus

20 GPa2.9 Msi
18.5 GPa2.7 Msi

Bulk Modulus

50 GPa7.3 Msi
52 GPa7.5 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.33
0.34

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

66 MPa9.6 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

42 MPa6.1 ksi
28 MPa4.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

3%
25%

Compressive Strength

105 MPa15.2 ksi
—

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

27 MPa3.9 ksi
20 MPa2.9 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

3 J2.2 ft·lbf
—

Hardness, Brinell

25 HB
23 HB

Hardness, Vickers

26 HV
25 HV

Same in both: Shear Strength 40 MPa5.8 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.39 g/cm³0.27 lb/in³
7.35 g/cm³0.27 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

241°C466 °F
235°C455 °F

Liquidus Temperature

354°C669 °F
295°C563 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

55 W/m·K31.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F
52 W/m·K30 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23 µm/m·K12.8 µin/in·°F
22.5 µm/m·K12.5 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

120°C248 °F
100°C212 °F

Min Service Temperature

-50°C-58 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 230 J/kg·K0.05 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 60 J/g25.8 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

8 % IACS
9 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.1×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.27 µΩ·in
1.9×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.48 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

50 / 100
65 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.5 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

85 / 100
65 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

80%
70%

Weldability

20 / 100
30 / 100

Formability (cold)

20 / 100
70 / 100

Castability

95 / 100
90 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

90 / 100
95 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
90 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

260 MJ/kg111,780 BTU/lb
290 MJ/kg124,678 BTU/lb

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 17 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

9 kN·m/kg
8 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

7.2 MN·m/kg
6.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

17 kJ/m³
8 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

32.4 mm²/s
30.8 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every solder & low-melting alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

125102050891011Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleBabbitt Grade 2 (Tin-Base)Britannia Metal

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityBabbitt Grade 2 (Tin-Base)Britannia Metal
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Babbitt Grade 2 (Tin-Base) vs Britannia Metal — frequently asked

Is Babbitt Grade 2 (Tin-Base) stronger than Britannia Metal?

Yes. Babbitt Grade 2 (Tin-Base) has a typical yield strength of 42 MPa (6.09 ksi) against 28 MPa (4.06 ksi) for Britannia Metal — about 50% more. Tensile strength is 66 MPa (9.57 ksi) vs 60 MPa (8.7 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Babbitt Grade 2 (Tin-Base) or Britannia Metal?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, Babbitt Grade 2 (Tin-Base) or Britannia Metal?

Babbitt Grade 2 (Tin-Base). Its machinability rates excellent (85/100) against good (65/100) for Britannia Metal; for welding the order is Britannia Metal first (poor, 30/100) then Babbitt Grade 2 (Tin-Base) (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Babbitt Grade 2 (Tin-Base) and Britannia Metal side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.