Refractory Metal O-30H vs S-65
Refractory Metal · grade comparison
Refractory Metal O-30H and S-65 are both refractory metal grades. S-65 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 230 MPa (33.4 ksi) against 207 MPa (30 ksi) for O-30H, about 11% more; tensile strength follows at 350 MPa (50.8 ksi) vs 324 MPa (47 ksi). S-65 is the more ductile: elongation 4.5% versus 3% for O-30H, and O-30H is harder (140 HB vs 115 HB). On the shop floor, S-65 machines more easily (45 vs 35 out of 100).
S-65Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.
O-30H vs S-65: propertiesHow to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all refractory metal grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
How to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all refractory metal grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
Mechanical
Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.
Shear Modulus
Bulk Modulus
Poisson's Ratio
Tensile Strength (Ultimate)
Yield Strength (0.2% offset)
Elongation at Break
Reduction in Area
Compressive Strength
Shear Strength
Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)
Fracture Toughness (K_IC)
Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)
Hardness, Brinell
Hardness, Rockwell B
Hardness, Vickers
Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 303 GPa43.9 Msi
Physical
Density and transition temperatures.
Same in both: Density 1.85 g/cm³0.07 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,287°C2,349 °F · Liquidus Temperature 1,289°C2,352 °F
Thermal
How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.
Thermal Conductivity
Min Service Temperature
Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 1,925 J/kg·K0.46 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 11.3 µm/m·K6.3 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 1,355 J/g583 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 500°C932 °F
Electrical
Conductivity and insulation.
Electrical Conductivity
Electrical Resistivity
Chemical & Environmental
Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).
Corrosion Resistance
Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -1 V
Manufacturability
FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.
Machinability
Weldability
Formability (cold)
Polishability
Castability
Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 40% · Brazeability / Solderability 55 / 100
Sustainability
Primary-production footprint per kilogram.
Embodied Energy (primary production)
Embodied Carbon (primary production)
Embodied Water
Typical Recycled Content
Common Calculations
Ratios derived from the values above.
Specific Strength (UTS / density)
Modulus of Resilience
Thermal Diffusivity
Thermal Shock Resistance Index
Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 163.8 MN·m/kg
Strength versus weight
Yield strength against density for every refractory metal grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.
Manufacturing and finishing
| Capability | O-30H | S-65 |
|---|---|---|
| Default condition | — | — |
| Relative cost | $$$$ High | $$$$ High |
| Min. machined wall | — | — |
| Best machined surface | — | — |
O-30H vs S-65 — frequently asked
Is S-65 stronger than O-30H?
Yes. S-65 has a typical yield strength of 230 MPa (33.4 ksi) against 207 MPa (30 ksi) for O-30H — about 11% more. Tensile strength is 350 MPa (50.8 ksi) vs 324 MPa (47 ksi).
Which is cheaper, O-30H or S-65?
Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.
Which is easier to machine, O-30H or S-65?
S-65, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 45/100 against 35/100 for O-30H; for welding the order is S-65 first (poor, 20/100) then O-30H (poor, 15/100).
Ready to make it?
Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in O-30H and S-65 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.
Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.