FabDigitFabDigit

Precious Metal BAg-2a vs BVAg-31

Precious Metal · grade comparison

Precious Metal BAg-2a and BVAg-31 are both precious metal grades. BVAg-31 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) against 210 MPa (30.5 ksi) for BAg-2a, about 14% more. In exchange, BAg-2a is the more ductile: elongation 28% versus 22% for BVAg-31, and BVAg-31 is harder (110 HB vs 85 HB). BAg-2a is lighter (9.4 g/cm³ vs 10.1 g/cm³ for BVAg-31) and BVAg-31 is stiffer (100 GPa vs 90 GPa). On the shop floor, BVAg-31 welds better (30 vs 20 out of 100).

BAg-2aChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

BVAg-31Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

BAg-2a vs BVAg-31: properties

BAg-2aBVAg-31

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

90 GPa13.1 Msi
100 GPa14.5 Msi

Shear Modulus

33 GPa4.8 Msi
37 GPa5.4 Msi

Bulk Modulus

95 GPa13.8 Msi
115 GPa16.7 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.36
0.37

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

400 MPa58 ksi
420 MPa60.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

210 MPa30.5 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

28%
22%

Shear Strength

175 MPa25.4 ksi
230 MPa33.4 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

85 HB
110 HB

Hardness, Vickers

95 HV
115 HV

Reduction in Area

—
35%

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

—
140 MPa20.3 ksi

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
62 HRB

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

9.4 g/cm³0.34 lb/in³
10.1 g/cm³0.36 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

607°C1,125 °F
824°C1,515 °F

Liquidus Temperature

710°C1,310 °F
852°C1,566 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

75 W/m·K43.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
70 W/m·K40.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

280 J/kg·K0.07 BTU/lb·°F
260 J/kg·K0.06 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

19 µm/m·K10.6 µin/in·°F
18 µm/m·K10 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

120 J/g51.6 BTU/lb
130 J/g55.9 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
450°C842 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

20 % IACS
11 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

8.6×10⁻⁸ Ω·m3.39 µΩ·in
1.6×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.3 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.05 V
0.05 V

Corrosion Resistance

62 / 100
82 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

45 / 100
40 / 100

Weldability

20 / 100
30 / 100

Castability

75 / 100
70 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
80 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

—
35%

Same in both: Formability (cold) 80 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 95 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

600 MJ/kg257,954 BTU/lb
4,400 MJ/kg1,891,661 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

45 kg CO₂/kg
420 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

2,500 L/kg300 gal/lb
—

Typical Recycled Content

45%
50%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

43 kN·m/kg
42 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

9.6 MN·m/kg
9.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

245 kJ/m³
288 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

28.5 mm²/s
26.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

18
16

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every precious metal grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

50100200500101520Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleBAg-2aBVAg-31

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityBAg-2aBVAg-31
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

BAg-2a vs BVAg-31 — frequently asked

Is BVAg-31 stronger than BAg-2a?

Yes. BVAg-31 has a typical yield strength of 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) against 210 MPa (30.5 ksi) for BAg-2a — about 14% more. Tensile strength is 420 MPa (60.9 ksi) vs 400 MPa (58 ksi).

Which is cheaper, BAg-2a or BVAg-31?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, BAg-2a or BVAg-31?

BAg-2a, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 45/100 against 40/100 for BVAg-31; for welding the order is BVAg-31 first (poor, 30/100) then BAg-2a (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in BAg-2a and BVAg-31 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.