FabDigitFabDigit

Precious Metal BAg-1 vs Incusil-10 (Ag-Cu-In-Ti)

Precious Metal · grade comparison

Precious Metal BAg-1 and Incusil-10 (Ag-Cu-In-Ti) are both precious metal grades. Incusil-10 (Ag-Cu-In-Ti) is the stronger of the two: yield strength 220 MPa (31.9 ksi) against 200 MPa (29 ksi) for BAg-1, about 10% more. Incusil-10 (Ag-Cu-In-Ti) is harder — 62 HRB against 56 HRB for BAg-1 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. BAg-1 is lighter (9.3 g/cm³ vs 9.9 g/cm³ for Incusil-10 (Ag-Cu-In-Ti)) and BAg-1 is stiffer (83 GPa vs 76 GPa).

BAg-1Choose it when weight is the constraint.

Incusil-10 (Ag-Cu-In-Ti)Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

BAg-1 vs Incusil-10 (Ag-Cu-In-Ti): properties

BAg-1Incusil-10 (Ag-Cu-In-Ti)

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

83 GPa12 Msi
76 GPa11 Msi

Shear Modulus

31 GPa4.5 Msi
28 GPa4.1 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

414 MPa60 ksi
330 MPa47.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

200 MPa29 ksi
220 MPa31.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

21%
20%

Shear Strength

170 MPa24.7 ksi
210 MPa30.5 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

90 HB
—

Hardness, Rockwell B

56 HRB
62 HRB

Bulk Modulus

—
84 GPa12.2 Msi

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.36 · Hardness, Vickers 95 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

9.3 g/cm³0.34 lb/in³
9.9 g/cm³0.36 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

607°C1,125 °F
685°C1,265 °F

Liquidus Temperature

618°C1,144 °F
730°C1,346 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

100 W/m·K57.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F
70 W/m·K40.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

280 J/kg·K0.07 BTU/lb·°F
245 J/kg·K0.06 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

19 µm/m·K10.6 µin/in·°F
18.5 µm/m·K10.3 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

110 J/g47.3 BTU/lb
—

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
400°C752 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

22 % IACS
10 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

7.8×10⁻⁸ Ω·m3.07 µΩ·in
1.7×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.69 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.05 V
0.05 V

Corrosion Resistance

65 / 100
62 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

40 / 100
35 / 100

Formability (cold)

75 / 100
80 / 100

Castability

80 / 100
70 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

98 / 100
97 / 100

Same in both: Weldability 15 / 100 · Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

700 MJ/kg300,946 BTU/lb
1,250 MJ/kg537,404 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

48 kg CO₂/kg
90 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

15,000 L/kg1,797 gal/lb
3,000 L/kg359 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

40%
30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

45 kN·m/kg
33 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

8.9 MN·m/kg
7.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

241 kJ/m³
318 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

38.4 mm²/s
28.9 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

26
16

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every precious metal grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

50100200500101520Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleBAg-1Incusil-10 (Ag-Cu-In-Ti)

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityBAg-1Incusil-10 (Ag-Cu-In-Ti)
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

BAg-1 vs Incusil-10 (Ag-Cu-In-Ti) — frequently asked

Is Incusil-10 (Ag-Cu-In-Ti) stronger than BAg-1?

Yes. Incusil-10 (Ag-Cu-In-Ti) has a typical yield strength of 220 MPa (31.9 ksi) against 200 MPa (29 ksi) for BAg-1 — about 10% more. Tensile strength is 330 MPa (47.9 ksi) vs 414 MPa (60 ksi).

Which is cheaper, BAg-1 or Incusil-10 (Ag-Cu-In-Ti)?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, BAg-1 or Incusil-10 (Ag-Cu-In-Ti)?

BAg-1, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 40/100 against 35/100 for Incusil-10 (Ag-Cu-In-Ti).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in BAg-1 and Incusil-10 (Ag-Cu-In-Ti) side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.