FabDigitFabDigit

Precious Metal Argentium 935 vs Britannia Silver (958)

Precious Metal · grade comparison

Precious Metal Argentium 935 and Britannia Silver (958) are both precious metal grades. Argentium 935 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 80 MPa (11.6 ksi) against 60 MPa (8.7 ksi) for Britannia Silver (958), about 33% more; tensile strength follows at 260 MPa (37.7 ksi) vs 240 MPa (34.8 ksi). Britannia Silver (958) conducts heat better (385 W/m·K vs 330 W/m·K). On the shop floor, Argentium 935 machines more easily (good vs fair) and Argentium 935 welds better (excellent vs very good).

Argentium 935Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

Argentium 935 vs Britannia Silver (958): properties

Argentium 935Britannia Silver (958)

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Bulk Modulus

102 GPa14.8 Msi
101 GPa14.6 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

260 MPa37.7 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

80 MPa11.6 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

45%
48%

Reduction in Area

50%
—

Shear Strength

170 MPa24.7 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

100 MPa14.5 ksi
95 MPa13.8 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

48 HB
47 HB

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 76 GPa11 Msi · Shear Modulus 28 GPa4.1 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.37 · Hardness, Vickers 50 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

10.3 g/cm³0.37 lb/in³
10.41 g/cm³0.38 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

800°C1,472 °F
779°C1,434 °F

Liquidus Temperature

890°C1,634 °F
932°C1,710 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

330 W/m·K191 BTU/hr·ft·°F
385 W/m·K222 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

235 J/kg·K0.06 BTU/lb·°F
236 J/kg·K0.06 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

18.9 µm/m·K10.5 µin/in·°F
19 µm/m·K10.6 µin/in·°F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-200°C-328 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 105 J/g45.1 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

80 % IACS
92 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.15×10⁻⁸ Ω·m0.846 µΩ·in
1.87×10⁻⁸ Ω·m0.736 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

0.05 V
0.12 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 78 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
45 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

55%
45%

Weldability

90 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

95 / 100
98 / 100

Castability

80 / 100
78 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

88 / 100
95 / 100

Polishability

96 / 100
97 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

1,600 MJ/kg687,877 BTU/lb
1,500 MJ/kg644,885 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

120 kg CO₂/kg
105 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

60%
55%

Embodied Water

—
2,500 L/kg300 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

25 kN·m/kg
23 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

7.4 MN·m/kg
7.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

42 kJ/m³
24 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

136.3 mm²/s
156.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

60
64

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every precious metal grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

50100200500101520Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleBritannia Silver (958)Argentium 935

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityArgentium 935Britannia Silver (958)
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Argentium 935 vs Britannia Silver (958) — frequently asked

Is Argentium 935 stronger than Britannia Silver (958)?

Yes. Argentium 935 has a typical yield strength of 80 MPa (11.6 ksi) against 60 MPa (8.7 ksi) for Britannia Silver (958) — about 33% more. Tensile strength is 260 MPa (37.7 ksi) vs 240 MPa (34.8 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Argentium 935 or Britannia Silver (958)?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, Argentium 935 or Britannia Silver (958)?

Argentium 935. Its machinability rates good (55/100) against fair (45/100) for Britannia Silver (958); for welding the order is Argentium 935 first (excellent, 90/100) then Britannia Silver (958) (very good, 70/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Argentium 935 and Britannia Silver (958) side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.