FabDigitFabDigit

Precious Metal AgCu10 vs Britannia Silver (958)

Precious Metal · grade comparison

Precious Metal AgCu10 and Britannia Silver (958) are both precious metal grades. AgCu10 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 115 MPa (16.7 ksi) against 60 MPa (8.7 ksi) for Britannia Silver (958), about 92% more; tensile strength follows at 285 MPa (41.3 ksi) vs 240 MPa (34.8 ksi). In exchange, Britannia Silver (958) is the more ductile: elongation 48% versus 35% for AgCu10, and AgCu10 is harder (60 HB vs 47 HB). AgCu10 runs hotter in service (250°C vs 200°C continuous). On the shop floor, AgCu10 machines more easily (good vs fair) and Britannia Silver (958) welds better (very good vs good).

AgCu10Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

Britannia Silver (958)Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

AgCu10 vs Britannia Silver (958): properties

AgCu10Britannia Silver (958)

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

78 GPa11.3 Msi
76 GPa11 Msi

Shear Modulus

29 GPa4.2 Msi
28 GPa4.1 Msi

Bulk Modulus

103 GPa14.9 Msi
101 GPa14.6 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

285 MPa41.3 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

115 MPa16.7 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

35%
48%

Shear Strength

175 MPa25.4 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

105 MPa15.2 ksi
95 MPa13.8 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

60 HB
47 HB

Hardness, Vickers

62 HV
50 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.37

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

10.31 g/cm³0.37 lb/in³
10.41 g/cm³0.38 lb/in³

Liquidus Temperature

875°C1,607 °F
932°C1,710 °F

Same in both: Melting Point (Solidus) 779°C1,434 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

355 W/m·K205 BTU/hr·ft·°F
385 W/m·K222 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

237 J/kg·K0.06 BTU/lb·°F
236 J/kg·K0.06 BTU/lb·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

250°C482 °F
200°C392 °F

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 19 µm/m·K10.6 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 105 J/g45.1 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -200°C-328 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

85 % IACS
92 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.03×10⁻⁸ Ω·m0.799 µΩ·in
1.87×10⁻⁸ Ω·m0.736 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) 0.12 V · Corrosion Resistance 78 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
45 / 100

Weldability

60 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

90 / 100
98 / 100

Castability

75 / 100
78 / 100

Polishability

95 / 100
97 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

—
45%

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 95 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

1,400 MJ/kg601,892 BTU/lb
1,500 MJ/kg644,885 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

95 kg CO₂/kg
105 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

22,000 L/kg2,636 gal/lb
2,500 L/kg300 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

60%
55%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

28 kN·m/kg
23 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

7.6 MN·m/kg
7.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

85 kJ/m³
24 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

145.3 mm²/s
156.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

68
64

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every precious metal grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

50100200500101520Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleBritannia Silver (958)AgCu10

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityAgCu10Britannia Silver (958)
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

AgCu10 vs Britannia Silver (958) — frequently asked

Is AgCu10 stronger than Britannia Silver (958)?

Yes. AgCu10 has a typical yield strength of 115 MPa (16.7 ksi) against 60 MPa (8.7 ksi) for Britannia Silver (958) — about 92% more. Tensile strength is 285 MPa (41.3 ksi) vs 240 MPa (34.8 ksi).

Which is cheaper, AgCu10 or Britannia Silver (958)?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, AgCu10 or Britannia Silver (958)?

AgCu10. Its machinability rates good (55/100) against fair (45/100) for Britannia Silver (958); for welding the order is Britannia Silver (958) first (very good, 70/100) then AgCu10 (good, 60/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in AgCu10 and Britannia Silver (958) side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.