FabDigitFabDigit

PU-Foam-Rigid vs PU-Nylon-like

Polyurethane · grade comparison

PU-Foam-Rigid and PU-Nylon-like are both polyurethane grades. PU-Nylon-like is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) against 6 MPa (0.87 ksi) for PU-Foam-Rigid, about 9.2 times as much. PU-Nylon-like is the more ductile: elongation 25% versus 4% for PU-Foam-Rigid, and PU-Nylon-like is harder (82 Shore D vs 45 Shore D). PU-Foam-Rigid is lighter (0.3 g/cm³ vs 1.13 g/cm³ for PU-Nylon-like) and PU-Nylon-like is stiffer (1.9 GPa vs 0.18 GPa). On the shop floor, PU-Foam-Rigid machines more easily (excellent vs very good) and PU-Foam-Rigid sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than PU-Nylon-like (high, $$$$).

PU-Foam-RigidChoose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part is machined in volume.

PU-Nylon-likeChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

PU-Foam-Rigid vs PU-Nylon-like: properties

PU-Foam-RigidPU-Nylon-like

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.18 GPa0.03 Msi
1.9 GPa0.28 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.4

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

6 MPa0.87 ksi
55 MPa8 ksi

Elongation at Break

4%
25%

Compressive Strength

6 MPa0.8 ksi
80 MPa11.6 ksi

Compressive Modulus

0.16 GPa0.02 Msi
1.8 GPa0.26 Msi

Flexural Strength

9 MPa1.3 ksi
75 MPa10.9 ksi

Flexural Modulus

0.22 GPa0.03 Msi
2 GPa0.29 Msi

Shear Strength

3 MPa0.36 ksi
—

Izod Impact, Notched

18 J/m0.34 ft·lbf/in
60 J/m1.1 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

45 Shore D
82 Shore D

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

—
48 MPa7 ksi

Hardness, Rockwell R

—
108 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.3 g/cm³0.01 lb/in³
1.13 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

95°C203 °F
75°C167 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.8%
0.4%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

3%
1.5%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.07 W/m·K0.04 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,500 J/kg·K0.36 BTU/lb·°F
1,600 J/kg·K0.38 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

70 µm/m·K38.9 µin/in·°F
110 µm/m·K61.1 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

85°C185 °F
80°C176 °F

Min Service Temperature

-50°C-58 °F
-30°C-22 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

85°C185 °F
88°C190 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

120°C248 °F
110°C230 °F

Same in both: Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa 70°C158 °F · Limiting Oxygen Index 20%

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹¹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁸ µΩ·in
1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

1.6
3.6

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.02
0.03

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm

Dielectric Strength

—
20 kV/mm508 V/mil

Surface Resistivity

—
1×10¹⁴ Ω

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

—
72 / 100

Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 25 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

88 / 100
72 / 100

Polishability

20 / 100
65 / 100

Mold Temperature (typ.)

35°C95 °F
65°C149 °F

Weldability

—
5 / 100

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

—
50°C122 °F

Same in both: Formability (cold) 5 / 100 · Mold Shrinkage 0.3%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

103 MJ/kg44,282 BTU/lb
100 MJ/kg42,992 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.6 kg CO₂/kg
5.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

220 L/kg26.4 gal/lb
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

20 kN·m/kg
49 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.6 MN·m/kg
1.7 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.2 mm²/s
0.1 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polyurethane grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

71015203050701.11.21.31.4Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePU-Nylon-like

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPU-Foam-RigidPU-Nylon-like
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

PU-Foam-Rigid vs PU-Nylon-like — frequently asked

Is PU-Nylon-like stronger than PU-Foam-Rigid?

Yes. PU-Nylon-like has a typical tensile strength of 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) against 6 MPa (0.87 ksi) for PU-Foam-Rigid — about 9.2 times as much.

Which is cheaper, PU-Foam-Rigid or PU-Nylon-like?

PU-Foam-Rigid is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while PU-Nylon-like is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, PU-Foam-Rigid or PU-Nylon-like?

PU-Foam-Rigid. Its machinability rates excellent (88/100) against very good (72/100) for PU-Nylon-like.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PU-Foam-Rigid and PU-Nylon-like side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.