FabDigitFabDigit

SAN GF30 vs SAN IM

Polymer · SAN grade comparison

SAN GF30 and SAN IM are two grades of the same polymer grade, SAN: GF30 (30% Glass Fiber reinforced SAN) versus IM (impact-modified / transparent toughened SAN). The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. SAN GF30 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 70 MPa (10.2 ksi) against 44 MPa (6.38 ksi) for SAN IM, about 59% more; tensile strength follows at 115 MPa (16.7 ksi) vs 48 MPa (6.96 ksi). In exchange, SAN IM is the more ductile: elongation 20% versus 1.8% for SAN GF30, and SAN GF30 is harder (84 Shore D vs 76 Shore D). SAN IM is lighter (1.08 g/cm³ vs 1.31 g/cm³ for SAN GF30) and SAN GF30 is stiffer (9.5 GPa vs 2.2 GPa). On the shop floor, SAN IM machines more easily (good vs fair) and SAN GF30 welds better (very good vs good).

SAN GF30Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

SAN IMChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

SAN GF30 vs SAN IM: properties

SAN GF30SAN IM

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

9.5 GPa1.4 Msi
2.2 GPa0.32 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

115 MPa16.7 ksi
48 MPa7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

70 MPa10.2 ksi
44 MPa6.4 ksi

Elongation at Break

1.8%
20%

Compressive Strength

100 MPa14.5 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Flexural Strength

165 MPa23.9 ksi
66 MPa9.6 ksi

Flexural Modulus

9 GPa1.3 Msi
2.3 GPa0.33 Msi

Shear Strength

45 MPa6.5 ksi
33 MPa4.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

1.5 MPa·√m1.4 ksi·√in
2.8 MPa·√m2.5 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

65 J/m1.2 ft·lbf/in
110 J/m2.1 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

84 Shore D
76 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

92 HRM
55 HRM

Hardness, Rockwell R

120 HRR
108 HRR

Same in both: Shear Modulus 1.3 GPa0.19 Msi · Bulk Modulus 4 GPa0.58 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.35 · Compressive Modulus 3.5 GPa0.51 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.31 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.08 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Light Transmission

0%
85%

Same in both: Glass Transition (Tg) 106°C223 °F · Water Absorption (24 h) 0.25% · Water Absorption (Saturation) 0.9% · Refractive Index 1.571

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.17 W/m·K0.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.18 W/m·K0.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

28 µm/m·K15.6 µin/in·°F
70 µm/m·K38.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

92°C198 °F
70°C158 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

108°C226 °F
86°C187 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

102°C216 °F
78°C172 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

105°C221 °F
96°C205 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

19%
18%

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 1,350 J/kg·K0.32 BTU/lb·°F · Min Service Temperature -30°C-22 °F · Max Service Temperature (short-term) 95°C203 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in · Dielectric Strength 22 kV/mm559 V/mil · Dielectric Constant (1 MHz) 2.9 · Dissipation Factor (1 MHz) 0.008 · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

72 / 100
55 / 100

Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 32 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

40 / 100
60 / 100

Weldability

70 / 100
58 / 100

Formability (cold)

45 / 100
42 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.2%
0.55%

Melt Flow Rate

10 g/10 min
8 g/10 min

Same in both: Polishability 88 / 100 · Processing Melt Temperature (typ.) 240°C464 °F · Mold Temperature (typ.) 65°C149 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 96 MJ/kg41,273 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 3.5 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 180 L/kg21.6 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 0%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleSAN

SAN GF30 vs SAN IM — frequently asked

Is SAN GF30 stronger than SAN IM?

Yes. SAN GF30 has a typical yield strength of 70 MPa (10.2 ksi) against 44 MPa (6.38 ksi) for SAN IM — about 59% more. Tensile strength is 115 MPa (16.7 ksi) vs 48 MPa (6.96 ksi).

Which grade does FabDigit quote by default, GF30 or IM?

Specify the condition in the material field or the drawing note; FabDigit prices the quote for the state you call out.

Which is easier to machine, SAN GF30 or SAN IM?

SAN IM. Its machinability rates good (60/100) against fair (40/100) for SAN GF30; for welding the order is SAN GF30 first (very good, 70/100) then SAN IM (good, 58/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in SAN GF30 and SAN IM side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.