FabDigitFabDigit

PET CF30 vs PET GF30

Polymer · grade comparison

PET CF30 and PET-GF30 are both polymer grades, compared here in the CF30 condition. PET CF30 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 200 MPa (29 ksi) against 150 MPa (21.8 ksi) for PET-GF30, about 33% more. In exchange, PET-GF30 is the more ductile: elongation 2.5% versus 1.8% for PET CF30, and PET-GF30 is harder (90 Shore D vs 85 Shore D). PET CF30 is lighter (1.46 g/cm³ vs 1.56 g/cm³ for PET-GF30) and PET CF30 is stiffer (21 GPa vs 9.5 GPa).

PET CF30Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

PET-GF30Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

PET CF30 vs PET-GF30: properties

PET CF30PET-GF30

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

21 GPa3 Msi
9.5 GPa1.4 Msi

Shear Modulus

1.1 GPa0.16 Msi
3.4 GPa0.49 Msi

Bulk Modulus

5 GPa0.65 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.38
0.39

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

200 MPa29 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

80 MPa11.6 ksi
—

Elongation at Break

1.8%
2.5%

Compressive Strength

175 MPa25.4 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Compressive Modulus

3 GPa0.44 Msi
8.5 GPa1.2 Msi

Flexural Strength

265 MPa38.4 ksi
225 MPa32.6 ksi

Flexural Modulus

19 GPa2.8 Msi
9 GPa1.3 Msi

Shear Strength

55 MPa8 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

4 MPa·√m3.6 ksi·√in
3.5 MPa·√m3.2 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

70 J/m1.3 ft·lbf/in
85 J/m1.6 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

85 Shore D
90 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

100 HRM
98 HRM

Same in both: Hardness, Rockwell R 120 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.46 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.56 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

253°C487 °F
255°C491 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.1%
0.12%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.35%
0.45%

Refractive Index

1.575
—

Light Transmission

88%
—

Same in both: Glass Transition (Tg) 79°C174 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.6 W/m·K0.35 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.29 W/m·K0.17 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,050 J/kg·K0.25 BTU/lb·°F
1,200 J/kg·K0.29 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

15 µm/m·K8.3 µin/in·°F
25 µm/m·K13.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
140°C284 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

230°C446 °F
224°C435 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

180°C356 °F
250°C482 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

24%
23%

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F · Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa 245°C473 °F · Max Service Temperature (short-term) 220°C428 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

100 Ω·m3.94×10⁹ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

22 kV/mm559 V/mil
28 kV/mm711 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.2
3.8

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.018
0.02

Volume Resistivity

10,000 Ω·cm
1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

100,000 Ω
1×10¹⁵ Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

600 V
250 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

70 / 100
72 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

45 / 100
30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Weldability

25 / 100
30 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
25 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.15%
0.3%

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

285°C545 °F
280°C536 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

120°C248 °F
135°C275 °F

Same in both: Machinability 45 / 100 · Formability (cold) 10 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

105 MJ/kg45,142 BTU/lb
80 MJ/kg34,394 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

6.5 kg CO₂/kg
3.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

120 L/kg14.4 gal/lb
80 L/kg9.6 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePET

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPET CF30PET-GF30
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Injection moldingYes—
Default conditionUnfilled—
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Chrome Plating (Plastic)Yes—
EMI Shielding CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Soft Touch CoatingYes—
Spray PaintingYes—
UV CoatingYes—

PET CF30 vs PET-GF30 — frequently asked

Is PET CF30 stronger than PET-GF30?

Yes. PET CF30 has a typical tensile strength of 200 MPa (29 ksi) against 150 MPa (21.8 ksi) for PET-GF30 — about 33% more.

Which is cheaper, PET CF30 or PET-GF30?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, PET CF30 or PET-GF30?

PET-GF30. Its weldability rates poor (30/100) against poor (25/100) for PET CF30.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PET CF30 and PET-GF30 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.