FabDigitFabDigit

EPS 150 vs XPS 500

Polymer · grade comparison

EPS 150 and XPS 500 are both polymer grades. XPS 500 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 0.55 MPa (0.0798 ksi) against 0.3 MPa (0.0435 ksi) for EPS 150, about 83% more. XPS 500 is the more ductile: elongation 3% versus 2% for EPS 150. EPS 150 is lighter (0.03 g/cm³ vs 0.05 g/cm³ for XPS 500) and XPS 500 is stiffer (0.03 GPa vs 0.01 GPa). On the shop floor, EPS 150 welds better (fair vs not recommended).

EPS 150Choose it when weight is the constraint, or when it will be welded.

XPS 500Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

EPS 150 vs XPS 500: properties

EPS 150XPS 500

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.01 GPa0 Msi
0.03 GPa0 Msi

Shear Modulus

0 GPa5.8×10⁻⁴ Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.1
0.3

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

0.3 MPa0.04 ksi
0.55 MPa0.08 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

0.15 MPa0.02 ksi
—

Elongation at Break

2%
3%

Compressive Strength

0.16 MPa0.02 ksi
0.6 MPa0.09 ksi

Compressive Modulus

0.01 GPa0 Msi
0.02 GPa0 Msi

Flexural Strength

0.28 MPa0.04 ksi
0.75 MPa0.11 ksi

Flexural Modulus

0.01 GPa0 Msi
0.02 GPa0 Msi

Shear Strength

0.14 MPa0.02 ksi
0.3 MPa0.04 ksi

Compression Set (22 h, 70 °C)

8%
5%

Hardness, Shore D

—
25 Shore D

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.03 g/cm³0 lb/in³
0.05 g/cm³0 lb/in³

Water Absorption (24 h)

1%
0.2%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

3.5%
0.8%

Same in both: Glass Transition (Tg) 100°C212 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.03 W/m·K0.02 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.03 W/m·K0.02 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

65 µm/m·K36.1 µin/in·°F
70 µm/m·K38.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

80°C176 °F
75°C167 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

96°C205 °F
100°C212 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

25%
28%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

100°C212 °F
90°C194 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 1,400 J/kg·K0.33 BTU/lb·°F · Min Service Temperature -50°C-58 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

1.03
1.15

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

3×10⁻⁴
—

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

58 / 100
85 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

12 / 100
20 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Weldability

40 / 100
10 / 100

Formability (cold)

25 / 100
15 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.4%
—

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

115°C239 °F
190°C374 °F

Same in both: Machinability 88 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

95 MJ/kg40,843 BTU/lb
100 MJ/kg42,992 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.3 kg CO₂/kg
7.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

190 L/kg22.8 gal/lb
130 L/kg15.6 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

5%
10%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.3 MN·m/kg
0.5 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.8 mm²/s
0.4 mm²/s

Same in both: Specific Strength (UTS / density) 11 kN·m/kg · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleEPS 150

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityEPS 150XPS 500
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

EPS 150 vs XPS 500 — frequently asked

Is XPS 500 stronger than EPS 150?

Yes. XPS 500 has a typical tensile strength of 0.55 MPa (0.0798 ksi) against 0.3 MPa (0.0435 ksi) for EPS 150 — about 83% more.

Which is cheaper, EPS 150 or XPS 500?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, EPS 150 or XPS 500?

EPS 150. Its weldability rates fair (40/100) against not recommended (10/100) for XPS 500.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in EPS 150 and XPS 500 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.