FabDigitFabDigit

Elastic Resin vs Formlabs Rigid 10K

Polymer · grade comparison

Elastic Resin and Rigid 10K are both polymer grades. Rigid 10K is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 75 MPa (10.9 ksi) against 3 MPa (0.464 ksi) for Elastic Resin, about 23 times as much. In exchange, Elastic Resin is the more ductile: elongation 160% versus 2.5% for Rigid 10K, and Rigid 10K is harder (85 Shore D vs 13 Shore D). Elastic Resin is lighter (1.12 g/cm³ vs 1.55 g/cm³ for Rigid 10K) and Rigid 10K is stiffer (5.5 GPa vs 0 GPa). On the shop floor, Rigid 10K machines more easily (fair vs not recommended) and Rigid 10K sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than Elastic Resin (high, $$$$).

Elastic ResinChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

Rigid 10KChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

Elastic Resin vs Rigid 10K: properties

Elastic ResinRigid 10K

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0 GPa4.06×10⁻⁴ Msi
5.5 GPa0.8 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.48
0.35

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

3 MPa0.46 ksi
75 MPa10.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

160%
2.5%

Compressive Strength

3 MPa0.36 ksi
105 MPa15.2 ksi

Compressive Modulus

0 GPa4.35×10⁻⁴ Msi
5 GPa0.73 Msi

Flexural Modulus

0 GPa4.5×10⁻⁴ Msi
5 GPa0.73 Msi

Shear Strength

2 MPa0.3 ksi
—

Hardness, Shore A

50 Shore A
—

Hardness, Shore D

13 Shore D
85 Shore D

Tear Strength

19 kN/m108 lbf/in
—

Compression Set (22 h, 70 °C)

5%
—

Flexural Strength

—
125 MPa18.1 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
0.9 MPa·√m0.82 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

—
17 J/m0.32 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Rockwell M

—
95 HRM

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.12 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.55 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

5°C41 °F
105°C221 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

1%
0.5%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

3%
—

Refractive Index

1.5
—

Light Transmission

70%
—

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.19 W/m·K0.11 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.3 W/m·K0.17 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,600 J/kg·K0.38 BTU/lb·°F
1,250 J/kg·K0.3 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

190 µm/m·K106 µin/in·°F
45 µm/m·K25 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

60°C140 °F
100°C212 °F

Min Service Temperature

-20°C-4 °F
-30°C-22 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

19%
21%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

90°C194 °F
150°C302 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

—
130°C266 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

—
105°C221 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹¹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁸ µΩ·in
1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

14 kV/mm356 V/mil
15 kV/mm381 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

4
3.6

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.05
0.03

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

—
1×10¹⁴ Ω

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

70 / 100
80 / 100

Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 25 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

12 / 100
40 / 100

Polishability

20 / 100
55 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

2%
—

Weldability

—
3 / 100

Formability (cold)

—
3 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

120 MJ/kg51,591 BTU/lb
115 MJ/kg49,441 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

220 L/kg26.4 gal/lb
200 L/kg24 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 6 kg CO₂/kg · Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

3 kN·m/kg
48 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0 MN·m/kg
3.5 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.1 mm²/s
0.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

1
0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleFormlabs Rigid 10K

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityElastic ResinRigid 10K
Injection molding—Yes
3D printing—Yes
Default condition—Glass Filled
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Chrome Plating (Plastic)—Yes
Conductive Coating—Yes
Dyeing (Nylon)—Yes
EMI Shielding Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Primer Coating—Yes
Soft Touch Coating—Yes
Spray Painting—Yes
Tinted Coating—Yes
UV Coating—Yes
Vacuum Metallization—Yes
Waterproof Coating—Yes

Elastic Resin vs Rigid 10K — frequently asked

Is Rigid 10K stronger than Elastic Resin?

Yes. Rigid 10K has a typical tensile strength of 75 MPa (10.9 ksi) against 3 MPa (0.464 ksi) for Elastic Resin — about 23 times as much.

Which is cheaper, Elastic Resin or Rigid 10K?

Rigid 10K is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while Elastic Resin is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, Elastic Resin or Rigid 10K?

Rigid 10K. Its machinability rates fair (40/100) against not recommended (12/100) for Elastic Resin.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Elastic Resin and Rigid 10K side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.