FabDigitFabDigit

E-44 vs EPN

Polymer · grade comparison

E-44 and EPN are both polymer grades. EPN is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 72 MPa (10.4 ksi) against 62 MPa (8.99 ksi) for E-44, about 16% more. In exchange, E-44 is the more ductile: elongation 4.5% versus 2% for EPN. EPN is stiffer (3.3 GPa vs 3.1 GPa) and EPN runs hotter in service (170°C vs 100°C continuous). On the shop floor, E-44 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than EPN (premium, $$$).

E-44Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when cost is the deciding factor.

EPNChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

E-44 vs EPN: properties

E-44EPN

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

3.1 GPa0.45 Msi
3.3 GPa0.48 Msi

Shear Modulus

1.2 GPa0.17 Msi
1.3 GPa0.18 Msi

Bulk Modulus

4 GPa0.52 Msi
4 GPa0.61 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.35
0.36

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

62 MPa9 ksi
72 MPa10.4 ksi

Elongation at Break

4.5%
2%

Compressive Strength

115 MPa16.7 ksi
155 MPa22.5 ksi

Compressive Modulus

2.9 GPa0.42 Msi
3.2 GPa0.46 Msi

Flexural Strength

100 MPa14.5 ksi
120 MPa17.4 ksi

Flexural Modulus

3 GPa0.44 Msi
3.4 GPa0.49 Msi

Shear Strength

20 MPa2.9 ksi
55 MPa8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

0.6 MPa·√m0.55 ksi·√in
0.55 MPa·√m0.5 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

25 J/m0.47 ft·lbf/in
18 J/m0.34 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

85 Shore D
88 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

100 HRM
108 HRM

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.18 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.21 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

105°C221 °F
175°C347 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.2%
0.15%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

2%
1.6%

Refractive Index

1.57
1.59

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.19 W/m·K0.11 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,050 J/kg·K0.25 BTU/lb·°F
1,100 J/kg·K0.26 BTU/lb·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

100°C212 °F
170°C338 °F

Min Service Temperature

-50°C-58 °F
-55°C-67 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

115°C239 °F
190°C374 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

95°C203 °F
168°C334 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

20%
23%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

140°C284 °F
220°C428 °F

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 60 µm/m·K33.3 µin/in·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

18 kV/mm457 V/mil
19 kV/mm483 V/mil

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω
1×10¹⁵ Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

350 V
250 V

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in · Dielectric Constant (1 MHz) 3.8 · Dissipation Factor (1 MHz) 0.02 · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

85 / 100
88 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

25 / 100
22 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

60 / 100
55 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.5%
1.2%

Mold Temperature (typ.)

80°C176 °F
165°C329 °F

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

—
100°C212 °F

Same in both: Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

137 MJ/kg58,899 BTU/lb
135 MJ/kg58,040 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

6.5 kg CO₂/kg
6.8 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Embodied Water 250 L/kg30 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

53 kN·m/kg
60 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.6 MN·m/kg
2.7 MN·m/kg

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.2 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityE-44EPN
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

E-44 vs EPN — frequently asked

Is EPN stronger than E-44?

Yes. EPN has a typical tensile strength of 72 MPa (10.4 ksi) against 62 MPa (8.99 ksi) for E-44 — about 16% more.

Which is cheaper, E-44 or EPN?

E-44 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while EPN is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, E-44 or EPN?

E-44, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 60/100 against 55/100 for EPN.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in E-44 and EPN side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.