FabDigitFabDigit

Denture Base Resin vs Formlabs Rigid 10K

Polymer · grade comparison

Denture Base Resin and Rigid 10K are both polymer grades. Rigid 10K is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 75 MPa (10.9 ksi) against 48 MPa (6.96 ksi) for Denture Base Resin, about 56% more. In exchange, Denture Base Resin is the more ductile: elongation 4% versus 2.5% for Rigid 10K. Denture Base Resin is lighter (1.18 g/cm³ vs 1.55 g/cm³ for Rigid 10K) and Rigid 10K is stiffer (5.5 GPa vs 2.2 GPa). On the shop floor, Denture Base Resin machines more easily (good vs fair) and Rigid 10K sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than Denture Base Resin (high, $$$$).

Denture Base ResinChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

Rigid 10KChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

Denture Base Resin vs Rigid 10K: properties

Denture Base ResinRigid 10K

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.2 GPa0.32 Msi
5.5 GPa0.8 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

48 MPa7 ksi
75 MPa10.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

45 MPa6.5 ksi
—

Elongation at Break

4%
2.5%

Compressive Strength

95 MPa13.8 ksi
105 MPa15.2 ksi

Flexural Strength

85 MPa12.3 ksi
125 MPa18.1 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2.2 GPa0.32 Msi
5 GPa0.73 Msi

Shear Strength

34 MPa4.9 ksi
—

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

1.3 MPa·√m1.2 ksi·√in
0.9 MPa·√m0.82 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

20 J/m0.37 ft·lbf/in
17 J/m0.32 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore A

96 Shore A
—

Hardness, Shore D

82 Shore D
85 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

85 HRM
95 HRM

Hardness, Rockwell R

118 HRR
—

Compressive Modulus

—
5 GPa0.73 Msi

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.35

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.18 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.55 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.8%
0.5%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

2%
—

Refractive Index

1.5
—

Same in both: Glass Transition (Tg) 105°C221 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.3 W/m·K0.17 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,450 J/kg·K0.35 BTU/lb·°F
1,250 J/kg·K0.3 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

80 µm/m·K44.4 µin/in·°F
45 µm/m·K25 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

60°C140 °F
100°C212 °F

Min Service Temperature

-20°C-4 °F
-30°C-22 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

90°C194 °F
130°C266 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

70°C158 °F
105°C221 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

85°C185 °F
—

Limiting Oxygen Index

18%
21%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

80°C176 °F
150°C302 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.5
3.6

Dielectric Strength

—
15 kV/mm381 V/mil

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

—
0.03

Surface Resistivity

—
1×10¹⁴ Ω

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

UV / Weathering Resistance

40 / 100
25 / 100

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 80 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

65 / 100
40 / 100

Weldability

5 / 100
3 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
3 / 100

Polishability

88 / 100
55 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.4%
—

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

30°C86 °F
—

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

110 MJ/kg47,292 BTU/lb
115 MJ/kg49,441 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.5 kg CO₂/kg
6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

—
200 L/kg24 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

41 kN·m/kg
48 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1.9 MN·m/kg
3.5 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.1 mm²/s
0.2 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleDenture Base ResinFormlabs Rigid 10K

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityDenture Base ResinRigid 10K
Injection molding—Yes
3D printing—Yes
Default condition—Glass Filled
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Chrome Plating (Plastic)—Yes
Conductive Coating—Yes
Dyeing (Nylon)—Yes
EMI Shielding Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Primer Coating—Yes
Soft Touch Coating—Yes
Spray Painting—Yes
Tinted Coating—Yes
UV Coating—Yes
Vacuum Metallization—Yes
Waterproof Coating—Yes

Denture Base Resin vs Rigid 10K — frequently asked

Is Rigid 10K stronger than Denture Base Resin?

Yes. Rigid 10K has a typical tensile strength of 75 MPa (10.9 ksi) against 48 MPa (6.96 ksi) for Denture Base Resin — about 56% more.

Which is cheaper, Denture Base Resin or Rigid 10K?

Rigid 10K is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while Denture Base Resin is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, Denture Base Resin or Rigid 10K?

Denture Base Resin. Its machinability rates good (65/100) against fair (40/100) for Rigid 10K.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Denture Base Resin and Rigid 10K side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.