FabDigitFabDigit

Denture Base Resin vs Flexible Resin

Polymer · grade comparison

Denture Base Resin and Flexible Resin are both polymer grades. Denture Base Resin is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 48 MPa (6.96 ksi) against 9 MPa (1.29 ksi) for Flexible Resin, about 5.4 times as much. In exchange, Flexible Resin is the more ductile: elongation 120% versus 4% for Denture Base Resin, and Denture Base Resin is harder (82 Shore D vs 30 Shore D). Flexible Resin is lighter (1.12 g/cm³ vs 1.18 g/cm³ for Denture Base Resin) and Denture Base Resin is stiffer (2.2 GPa vs 0.01 GPa). On the shop floor, Denture Base Resin machines more easily (good vs poor) and Flexible Resin sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than Denture Base Resin (high, $$$$).

Denture Base ResinChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

Flexible ResinChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

Denture Base Resin vs Flexible Resin: properties

Denture Base ResinFlexible Resin

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.2 GPa0.32 Msi
0.01 GPa0 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.35
0.48

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

48 MPa7 ksi
9 MPa1.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

45 MPa6.5 ksi
—

Elongation at Break

4%
120%

Compressive Strength

95 MPa13.8 ksi
5 MPa0.65 ksi

Flexural Strength

85 MPa12.3 ksi
—

Flexural Modulus

2.2 GPa0.32 Msi
—

Shear Strength

34 MPa4.9 ksi
6 MPa0.87 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

1.3 MPa·√m1.2 ksi·√in
—

Izod Impact, Notched

20 J/m0.37 ft·lbf/in
—

Hardness, Shore A

96 Shore A
80 Shore A

Hardness, Shore D

82 Shore D
30 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

85 HRM
—

Hardness, Rockwell R

118 HRR
—

Compressive Modulus

—
0.01 GPa0 Msi

Tear Strength

—
24 kN/m137 lbf/in

Compression Set (22 h, 70 °C)

—
4%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.18 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.12 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

105°C221 °F
5°C41 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.8%
1.2%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

2%
—

Same in both: Refractive Index 1.5

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Specific Heat Capacity

1,450 J/kg·K0.35 BTU/lb·°F
1,650 J/kg·K0.39 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

80 µm/m·K44.4 µin/in·°F
180 µm/m·K100 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

60°C140 °F
65°C149 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

90°C194 °F
60°C140 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

70°C158 °F
—

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

85°C185 °F
—

Limiting Oxygen Index

18%
19%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

80°C176 °F
85°C185 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Min Service Temperature -20°C-4 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in
1×10¹¹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁸ µΩ·in

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.5
4

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm
1×10¹³ Ω·cm

Dielectric Strength

—
14 kV/mm356 V/mil

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

80 / 100
70 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

40 / 100
25 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

65 / 100
15 / 100

Weldability

5 / 100
—

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
—

Polishability

88 / 100
25 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.4%
1.5%

Same in both: Processing Melt Temperature (typ.) 30°C86 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

110 MJ/kg47,292 BTU/lb
115 MJ/kg49,441 BTU/lb

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 5.5 kg CO₂/kg · Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

41 kN·m/kg
8 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1.9 MN·m/kg
0 MN·m/kg

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

0
1

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleDenture Base ResinFlexible Resin

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityDenture Base ResinFlexible Resin
Injection molding—Yes
3D printing—Yes
Default condition—Shore A 80
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Chrome Plating (Plastic)—Yes
Conductive Coating—Yes
Dyeing (Nylon)—Yes
EMI Shielding Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Primer Coating—Yes
Soft Touch Coating—Yes
Spray Painting—Yes
Tinted Coating—Yes
UV Coating—Yes
Vacuum Metallization—Yes
Waterproof Coating—Yes

Denture Base Resin vs Flexible Resin — frequently asked

Is Denture Base Resin stronger than Flexible Resin?

Yes. Denture Base Resin has a typical tensile strength of 48 MPa (6.96 ksi) against 9 MPa (1.29 ksi) for Flexible Resin — about 5.4 times as much.

Which is cheaper, Denture Base Resin or Flexible Resin?

Flexible Resin is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while Denture Base Resin is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, Denture Base Resin or Flexible Resin?

Denture Base Resin. Its machinability rates good (65/100) against poor (15/100) for Flexible Resin.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Denture Base Resin and Flexible Resin side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.