FabDigitFabDigit

Dental Model Resin vs Flexible Resin

Polymer · grade comparison

Dental Model Resin and Flexible Resin are both polymer grades. Dental Model Resin is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 58 MPa (8.41 ksi) against 9 MPa (1.29 ksi) for Flexible Resin, about 6.5 times as much. In exchange, Flexible Resin is the more ductile: elongation 120% versus 5% for Dental Model Resin, and Dental Model Resin is harder (86 Shore D vs 30 Shore D). Flexible Resin is lighter (1.12 g/cm³ vs 1.18 g/cm³ for Dental Model Resin) and Dental Model Resin is stiffer (2.4 GPa vs 0.01 GPa). On the shop floor, Dental Model Resin machines more easily (good vs poor) and Flexible Resin sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than Dental Model Resin (high, $$$$).

Dental Model ResinChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

Flexible ResinChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

Dental Model Resin vs Flexible Resin: properties

Dental Model ResinFlexible Resin

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.4 GPa0.35 Msi
0.01 GPa0 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.38
0.48

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

58 MPa8.4 ksi
9 MPa1.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

5%
120%

Compressive Strength

110 MPa16 ksi
5 MPa0.65 ksi

Flexural Strength

85 MPa12.3 ksi
—

Flexural Modulus

2.3 GPa0.33 Msi
—

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

1 MPa·√m0.91 ksi·√in
—

Izod Impact, Notched

20 J/m0.37 ft·lbf/in
—

Hardness, Shore D

86 Shore D
30 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

90 HRM
—

Compressive Modulus

—
0.01 GPa0 Msi

Shear Strength

—
6 MPa0.87 ksi

Hardness, Shore A

—
80 Shore A

Tear Strength

—
24 kN/m137 lbf/in

Compression Set (22 h, 70 °C)

—
4%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.18 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.12 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

78°C172 °F
5°C41 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.9%
1.2%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

2%
—

Refractive Index

1.52
1.5

Light Transmission

5%
—

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Specific Heat Capacity

1,500 J/kg·K0.36 BTU/lb·°F
1,650 J/kg·K0.39 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

80 µm/m·K44.4 µin/in·°F
180 µm/m·K100 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

55°C131 °F
65°C149 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

68°C154 °F
60°C140 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

55°C131 °F
—

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

80°C176 °F
85°C185 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

—
19%

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Min Service Temperature -20°C-4 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in
1×10¹¹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁸ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

16 kV/mm406 V/mil
14 kV/mm356 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.4
4

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm
1×10¹³ Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

UV / Weathering Resistance

35 / 100
25 / 100

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 70 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
15 / 100

Weldability

5 / 100
—

Formability (cold)

5 / 100
—

Polishability

65 / 100
25 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.35%
1.5%

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

28°C82 °F
30°C86 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

105 MJ/kg45,142 BTU/lb
115 MJ/kg49,441 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5 kg CO₂/kg
5.5 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

49 kN·m/kg
8 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2 MN·m/kg
0 MN·m/kg

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

0
1

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleFlexible Resin

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityDental Model ResinFlexible Resin
Injection molding—Yes
3D printing—Yes
Default condition—Shore A 80
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Chrome Plating (Plastic)—Yes
Conductive Coating—Yes
Dyeing (Nylon)—Yes
EMI Shielding Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Primer Coating—Yes
Soft Touch Coating—Yes
Spray Painting—Yes
Tinted Coating—Yes
UV Coating—Yes
Vacuum Metallization—Yes
Waterproof Coating—Yes

Dental Model Resin vs Flexible Resin — frequently asked

Is Dental Model Resin stronger than Flexible Resin?

Yes. Dental Model Resin has a typical tensile strength of 58 MPa (8.41 ksi) against 9 MPa (1.29 ksi) for Flexible Resin — about 6.5 times as much.

Which is cheaper, Dental Model Resin or Flexible Resin?

Flexible Resin is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while Dental Model Resin is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, Dental Model Resin or Flexible Resin?

Dental Model Resin. Its machinability rates good (55/100) against poor (15/100) for Flexible Resin.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Dental Model Resin and Flexible Resin side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.