FabDigitFabDigit

Clear vs PX521

Polymer · grade comparison

Clear and PX521 are both polymer grades, both clear plastic. PX521 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 72 MPa (10.4 ksi) against 65 MPa (9.43 ksi) for Clear, about 11% more. In exchange, Clear is the more ductile: elongation 6.5% versus 4% for PX521, and PX521 is harder (88 Shore D vs 80 Shore D). PX521 is stiffer (3.2 GPa vs 2.8 GPa) and PX521 runs hotter in service (80°C vs 55°C continuous). On the shop floor, PX521 machines more easily (very good vs fair) and PX521 welds better (poor vs not recommended).

ClearChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

PX521Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

Clear vs PX521: properties

ClearPX521

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.8 GPa0.41 Msi
3.2 GPa0.46 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.38
0.37

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

65 MPa9.4 ksi
72 MPa10.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

52 MPa7.5 ksi
—

Elongation at Break

6.5%
4%

Compressive Strength

80 MPa11.6 ksi
110 MPa16 ksi

Compressive Modulus

2.6 GPa0.38 Msi
3 GPa0.44 Msi

Flexural Strength

87 MPa12.6 ksi
105 MPa15.2 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2.2 GPa0.32 Msi
3.1 GPa0.45 Msi

Shear Strength

40 MPa5.8 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

0.9 MPa·√m0.82 ksi·√in
1.1 MPa·√m1 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

25 J/m0.47 ft·lbf/in
17 J/m0.32 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

80 Shore D
88 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

88 HRM
95 HRM

Shear Modulus

—
1.7 GPa0.25 Msi

Bulk Modulus

—
6 GPa0.8 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Glass Transition (Tg)

65°C149 °F
110°C230 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.6%
0.3%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

1.6%
2%

Refractive Index

1.52
1.49

Light Transmission

88%
92%

Same in both: Density 1.19 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.19 W/m·K0.11 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,450 J/kg·K0.35 BTU/lb·°F
1,470 J/kg·K0.35 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

110 µm/m·K61.1 µin/in·°F
70 µm/m·K38.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

55°C131 °F
80°C176 °F

Min Service Temperature

-30°C-22 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

73°C163 °F
105°C221 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

58°C136 °F
98°C208 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

68°C154 °F
110°C230 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

19%
18%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

85°C185 °F
95°C203 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in
1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

15 kV/mm381 V/mil
30 kV/mm762 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.2
2.7

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.03
0.02

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

—
1×10¹⁵ Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

—
600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

65 / 100
70 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

25 / 100
92 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

45 / 100
75 / 100

Weldability

5 / 100
30 / 100

Formability (cold)

5 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

85 / 100
95 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

110 MJ/kg47,292 BTU/lb
100 MJ/kg42,992 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.5 kg CO₂/kg
6.5 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

0%
5%

Embodied Water

—
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

55 kN·m/kg
61 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.4 MN·m/kg
2.7 MN·m/kg

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePX521Formlabs Clear

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityClearPX521
Default conditionStandardUV Resistant
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both are offered for Injection molding and 3D printing. Both take the same 12 finishes: Chrome Plating (Plastic), Conductive Coating, Dyeing (Nylon), EMI Shielding Coating, Painting, Primer Coating, Soft Touch Coating, Spray Painting, Tinted Coating, UV Coating, Vacuum Metallization, Waterproof Coating.

Clear vs PX521 — frequently asked

Is PX521 stronger than Clear?

Yes. PX521 has a typical tensile strength of 72 MPa (10.4 ksi) against 65 MPa (9.43 ksi) for Clear — about 11% more.

Which is cheaper, Clear or PX521?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, Clear or PX521?

PX521. Its machinability rates very good (75/100) against fair (45/100) for Clear; for welding the order is PX521 first (poor, 30/100) then Clear (not recommended, 5/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Clear and PX521 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.