FabDigitFabDigit

C578 Type XIV vs JIS A9511 EPS

Polymer · grade comparison

C578 Type XIV and JIS A9511 EPS are both polymer grades. C578 Type XIV is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 0.45 MPa (0.0653 ksi) against 0.2 MPa (0.029 ksi) for JIS A9511 EPS, about 125% more. JIS A9511 EPS is lighter (0.02 g/cm³ vs 0.04 g/cm³ for C578 Type XIV) and C578 Type XIV is stiffer (0.01 GPa vs 0.01 GPa). On the shop floor, C578 Type XIV forms better (fair vs poor).

C578 Type XIVChoose it when strength drives the design.

JIS A9511 EPSChoose it when weight is the constraint.

C578 Type XIV vs JIS A9511 EPS: properties

C578 Type XIVJIS A9511 EPS

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.01 GPa0 Msi
0.01 GPa7.25×10⁻⁴ Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.12
0.1

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

0.45 MPa0.07 ksi
0.2 MPa0.03 ksi

Compressive Strength

0.3 MPa0.04 ksi
0.08 MPa0.01 ksi

Compressive Modulus

0.01 GPa0 Msi
0 GPa6.53×10⁻⁴ Msi

Flexural Strength

0.58 MPa0.08 ksi
0.15 MPa0.02 ksi

Shear Strength

0.24 MPa0.03 ksi
0.1 MPa0.01 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

—
0.18 MPa0.03 ksi

Elongation at Break

—
1.5%

Flexural Modulus

—
0.01 GPa7.98×10⁻⁴ Msi

Compression Set (22 h, 70 °C)

—
4%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.04 g/cm³0 lb/in³
0.02 g/cm³7.23×10⁻⁴ lb/in³

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.4%
1.5%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

1.5%
4%

Same in both: Glass Transition (Tg) 100°C212 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.03 W/m·K0.02 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.04 W/m·K0.02 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,300 J/kg·K0.31 BTU/lb·°F
1,400 J/kg·K0.33 BTU/lb·°F

Min Service Temperature

-50°C-58 °F
-80°C-112 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

26%
18%

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

—
98°C208 °F

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 65 µm/m·K36.1 µin/in·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 75°C167 °F · Max Service Temperature (short-term) 85°C185 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

1.05
1.04

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

4×10⁻⁴
2×10⁻⁴

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

85 / 100
80 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

20 / 100
15 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

85 / 100
90 / 100

Weldability

25 / 100
30 / 100

Formability (cold)

40 / 100
25 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.5%
0.45%

Mold Temperature (typ.)

—
115°C239 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.3 kg CO₂/kg
3.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

150 L/kg18 gal/lb
165 L/kg19.8 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

10%
5%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 105 MJ/kg45,142 BTU/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

11 kN·m/kg
10 kN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.6 mm²/s
1.4 mm²/s

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 0.3 MN·m/kg · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleJIS A9511 EPS

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC578 Type XIVJIS A9511 EPS
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

C578 Type XIV vs JIS A9511 EPS — frequently asked

Is C578 Type XIV stronger than JIS A9511 EPS?

Yes. C578 Type XIV has a typical tensile strength of 0.45 MPa (0.0653 ksi) against 0.2 MPa (0.029 ksi) for JIS A9511 EPS — about 125% more.

Which is cheaper, C578 Type XIV or JIS A9511 EPS?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, C578 Type XIV or JIS A9511 EPS?

JIS A9511 EPS, by a small margin. Both rate excellent for machinability — 90/100 against 85/100 for C578 Type XIV; for welding the order is JIS A9511 EPS first (poor, 30/100) then C578 Type XIV (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C578 Type XIV and JIS A9511 EPS side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.