FabDigitFabDigit

Onyx vs Soapstone

Natural Material · grade comparison

Onyx and Soapstone are both natural material grades. Soapstone is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 10 MPa (1.45 ksi) against 6 MPa (0.87 ksi) for Onyx, about 67% more. Onyx is lighter (2.7 g/cm³ vs 2.95 g/cm³ for Soapstone) and Soapstone is stiffer (60 GPa vs 50 GPa). On the shop floor, Soapstone machines more easily (excellent vs good).

OnyxChoose it when weight is the constraint.

SoapstoneChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

Onyx vs Soapstone: properties

OnyxSoapstone

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

50 GPa7.3 Msi
60 GPa8.7 Msi

Bulk Modulus

40 GPa5.8 Msi
36 GPa5.2 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.26
0.27

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

6 MPa0.87 ksi
10 MPa1.5 ksi

Compressive Strength

90 MPa13.1 ksi
85 MPa12.3 ksi

Flexural Strength

10 MPa1.5 ksi
18 MPa2.6 ksi

Shear Strength

10 MPa1.5 ksi
18 MPa2.6 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

0.6 MPa·√m0.55 ksi·√in
1 MPa·√m0.91 ksi·√in

Hardness, Knoop

120 HK
60 HK

Hardness, Mohs

3.5
3

Same in both: Shear Modulus 20 GPa2.9 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.95 g/cm³0.11 lb/in³

Porosity

1.2%
0.6%

Melting Point (Solidus)

—
1,500°C2,732 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

2.3 W/m·K1.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
6 W/m·K3.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

850 J/kg·K0.2 BTU/lb·°F
980 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

8 µm/m·K4.4 µin/in·°F
9 µm/m·K5 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

100°C212 °F
900°C1,652 °F

Min Service Temperature

-20°C-4 °F
-60°C-76 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1,000,000 Ω·m3.94×10¹³ µΩ·in
1×10⁸ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁵ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

—
6 kV/mm152 V/mil

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

22 / 100
92 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

65 / 100
90 / 100

Polishability

88 / 100
60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

3 MJ/kg1,290 BTU/lb
2 MJ/kg860 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

0.22 kg CO₂/kg
0.14 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

12 L/kg1.4 gal/lb
20 L/kg2.4 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

2 kN·m/kg
3 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

18.5 MN·m/kg
20.3 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

1 mm²/s
2.1 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every natural material grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityOnyxSoapstone
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Onyx vs Soapstone — frequently asked

Is Soapstone stronger than Onyx?

Yes. Soapstone has a typical tensile strength of 10 MPa (1.45 ksi) against 6 MPa (0.87 ksi) for Onyx — about 67% more.

Which is cheaper, Onyx or Soapstone?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, Onyx or Soapstone?

Soapstone. Its machinability rates excellent (90/100) against good (65/100) for Onyx.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Onyx and Soapstone side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.