FabDigitFabDigit

IRG 24 vs SF11

Glass · grade comparison

IRG 24 and SF11 are both glass grades. SF11 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 40 MPa (5.8 ksi) against 16 MPa (2.32 ksi) for IRG 24, about 150% more. SF11 is harder — 450 HV against 110 HV for IRG 24 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. SF11 is stiffer (66 GPa vs 18.3 GPa) and SF11 runs hotter in service (400°C vs 120°C continuous). On the shop floor, IRG 24 machines more easily (excellent vs poor).

IRG 24Choose it when the part is machined in volume.

SF11Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

IRG 24 vs SF11: properties

IRG 24SF11

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

18.3 GPa2.7 Msi
66 GPa9.6 Msi

Shear Modulus

7.1 GPa1 Msi
26.7 GPa3.9 Msi

Bulk Modulus

14 GPa2.1 Msi
42 GPa6 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.29
0.24

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

16 MPa2.3 ksi
40 MPa5.8 ksi

Compressive Strength

200 MPa29 ksi
800 MPa116 ksi

Flexural Strength

18 MPa2.6 ksi
55 MPa8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

0.17 MPa·√m0.15 ksi·√in
0.65 MPa·√m0.59 ksi·√in

Hardness, Vickers

110 HV
450 HV

Hardness, Knoop

104 HK
450 HK

Hardness, Mohs

2.5
5

Same in both: Elongation at Break 0%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

4.64 g/cm³0.17 lb/in³
4.74 g/cm³0.17 lb/in³

Refractive Index

2.79
1.785

Light Transmission

67%
85%

Same in both: Porosity 0%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.74 W/m·K0.43 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

340 J/kg·K0.08 BTU/lb·°F
431 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

20.7 µm/m·K11.5 µin/in·°F
6.1 µm/m·K3.4 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

120°C248 °F
400°C752 °F

Min Service Temperature

-100°C-148 °F
-200°C-328 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹¹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁸ µΩ·in
1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm

Dielectric Strength

—
15 kV/mm381 V/mil

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

—
0.001

Same in both: Dielectric Constant (1 MHz) 8.5

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

55 / 100
45 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

85 / 100
25 / 100

Polishability

85 / 100
95 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

—
45 MJ/kg19,347 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

—
3.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

—
120 L/kg14.4 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

—
5%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

3 kN·m/kg
8 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

3.9 MN·m/kg
13.9 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.1 mm²/s
0.4 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every glass grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005002.533.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityIRG 24SF11
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

IRG 24 vs SF11 — frequently asked

Is SF11 stronger than IRG 24?

Yes. SF11 has a typical tensile strength of 40 MPa (5.8 ksi) against 16 MPa (2.32 ksi) for IRG 24 — about 150% more.

Which is cheaper, IRG 24 or SF11?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, IRG 24 or SF11?

IRG 24. Its machinability rates excellent (85/100) against poor (25/100) for SF11.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in IRG 24 and SF11 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.