FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy QBe1.9-TD01 vs QBe1.9-TM02

Copper Alloy · QBe1.9 temper comparison

QBe1.9-TD01 and QBe1.9-TM02 are two conditions of the same copper alloy grade, QBe1.9: TD01 (solution heat treated and cold worked, quarter hard) versus TM02 (mill hardened, half hard). The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. QBe1.9-TM02 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 690 MPa (100 ksi) against 450 MPa (65.3 ksi) for QBe1.9-TD01, about 53% more; tensile strength follows at 830 MPa (120 ksi) vs 560 MPa (81.2 ksi). In exchange, QBe1.9-TD01 is the more ductile: elongation 28% versus 12% for QBe1.9-TM02, and QBe1.9-TM02 is harder (265 HB vs 150 HB). QBe1.9-TM02 runs hotter in service (200°C vs 150°C continuous) and QBe1.9-TM02 conducts heat better (100 W/m·K vs 90 W/m·K).

QBe1.9-TD01Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

QBe1.9-TM02Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

QBe1.9-TD01 vs QBe1.9-TM02: properties

QBe1.9-TD01QBe1.9-TM02

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

125 GPa18.1 Msi
128 GPa18.6 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

560 MPa81.2 ksi
830 MPa120 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

450 MPa65.3 ksi
690 MPa100 ksi

Elongation at Break

28%
12%

Reduction in Area

45%
30%

Compressive Strength

470 MPa68.2 ksi
730 MPa106 ksi

Shear Strength

345 MPa50 ksi
525 MPa76.1 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

200 MPa29 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

70 MPa·√m63.7 ksi·√in
55 MPa·√m50.1 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

30 J22.1 ft·lbf
18 J13.3 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

150 HB
265 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

39 HRC
27 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

160 HV
275 HV

Same in both: Shear Modulus 50 GPa7.3 Msi · Bulk Modulus 108 GPa15.7 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.3

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 8.26 g/cm³0.3 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 865°C1,589 °F · Liquidus Temperature 980°C1,796 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

90 W/m·K52 BTU/hr·ft·°F
100 W/m·K57.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
200°C392 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 420 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 17 µm/m·K9.4 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -200°C-328 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

17 % IACS
20 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.01×10⁻⁷ Ω·m3.98 µΩ·in
8.6×10⁻⁸ Ω·m3.39 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.24 V · Corrosion Resistance 62 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

34 / 100
39 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

20%
23%

Weldability

50 / 100
45 / 100

Formability (cold)

70 / 100
45 / 100

Same in both: Castability 55 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 75 / 100 · Polishability 85 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 105 MJ/kg45,142 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 7.5 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 480 L/kg57.5 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 25%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleQBe1.9

QBe1.9-TD01 vs QBe1.9-TM02 — frequently asked

Is QBe1.9-TM02 stronger than QBe1.9-TD01?

Yes. QBe1.9-TM02 has a typical yield strength of 690 MPa (100 ksi) against 450 MPa (65.3 ksi) for QBe1.9-TD01 — about 53% more. Tensile strength is 830 MPa (120 ksi) vs 560 MPa (81.2 ksi).

Which condition does FabDigit quote by default, TD01 or TM02?

TF00 is the default QBe1.9 condition in the FabDigit quote flow (neither TD01 nor TM02). The other condition is available on request or by drawing note — specify it in the material field or the part notes and the quote is priced for it.

Which is easier to machine, QBe1.9-TD01 or QBe1.9-TM02?

QBe1.9-TM02. Its machinability rates fair (39/100) against poor (34/100) for QBe1.9-TD01; for welding the order is QBe1.9-TD01 first (fair, 50/100) then QBe1.9-TM02 (fair, 45/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in QBe1.9-TD01 and QBe1.9-TM02 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.