Copper Alloy CC750S vs CC752S
Copper Alloy · grade comparison
Copper Alloy CC750S and CC752S are both copper alloy grades. CC752S is the stronger of the two: yield strength 110 MPa (16 ksi) against 90 MPa (13.1 ksi) for CC750S, about 22% more; tensile strength follows at 280 MPa (40.6 ksi) vs 210 MPa (30.5 ksi). In exchange, CC750S is the more ductile: elongation 18% versus 15% for CC752S, and CC752S is harder (75 HB vs 55 HB). On the shop floor, CC750S sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than CC752S (high, $$$$).
CC750SChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when cost is the deciding factor.
CC752SChoose it when strength drives the design.
CC750S vs CC752S: propertiesHow to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all copper alloy grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
How to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all copper alloy grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
Mechanical
Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.
Tensile Strength (Ultimate)
Yield Strength (0.2% offset)
Elongation at Break
Reduction in Area
Compressive Strength
Shear Strength
Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)
Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)
Hardness, Brinell
Hardness, Rockwell B
Hardness, Vickers
Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 95 GPa13.8 Msi · Shear Modulus 36 GPa5.2 Msi · Bulk Modulus 105 GPa15.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.34
Physical
Density and transition temperatures.
Density
Melting Point (Solidus)
Liquidus Temperature
Thermal
How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.
Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 115 W/m·K66.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Specific Heat Capacity 380 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 20.5 µm/m·K11.4 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 170 J/g73.1 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F · Min Service Temperature -100°C-148 °F
Electrical
Conductivity and insulation.
Electrical Conductivity
Electrical Resistivity
Chemical & Environmental
Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).
Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)
Corrosion Resistance
Manufacturability
FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.
Machinability
Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)
Weldability
Brazeability / Solderability
Same in both: Formability (cold) 20 / 100 · Castability 85 / 100 · Polishability 75 / 100
Sustainability
Primary-production footprint per kilogram.
Embodied Energy (primary production)
Embodied Carbon (primary production)
Embodied Water
Typical Recycled Content
Common Calculations
Ratios derived from the values above.
Specific Strength (UTS / density)
Modulus of Resilience
Thermal Diffusivity
Thermal Shock Resistance Index
Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 11.2 MN·m/kg
Strength versus weight
Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.
Manufacturing and finishing
| Capability | CC750S | CC752S |
|---|---|---|
| Default condition | — | — |
| Relative cost | $$$ Premium | $$$$ High |
| Min. machined wall | — | — |
| Best machined surface | — | — |
Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.
CC750S vs CC752S — frequently asked
Is CC752S stronger than CC750S?
Yes. CC752S has a typical yield strength of 110 MPa (16 ksi) against 90 MPa (13.1 ksi) for CC750S — about 22% more. Tensile strength is 280 MPa (40.6 ksi) vs 210 MPa (30.5 ksi).
Which is cheaper, CC750S or CC752S?
CC750S is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while CC752S is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.
Which is easier to machine, CC750S or CC752S?
CC750S. Its machinability rates excellent (85/100) against very good (80/100) for CC752S; for welding the order is CC752S first (poor, 25/100) then CC750S (poor, 20/100).
Ready to make it?
Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in CC750S and CC752S side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.
Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.