FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C74500 vs C76400

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C74500 and C76400 are both copper alloy grades. C76400 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 510 MPa (74 ksi) against 400 MPa (58 ksi) for C74500, about 28% more; tensile strength follows at 585 MPa (84.8 ksi) vs 510 MPa (74 ksi). In exchange, C74500 is the more ductile: elongation 12% versus 4% for C76400, and C76400 is harder (165 HB vs 150 HB). C76400 runs hotter in service (200°C vs 180°C continuous) and C74500 conducts heat better (45 W/m·K vs 29 W/m·K). On the shop floor, C76400 welds better (good vs fair).

C74500Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

C76400Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

C74500 vs C76400: properties

C74500C76400

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

127 GPa18.4 Msi
125 GPa18.1 Msi

Shear Modulus

48 GPa7 Msi
46 GPa6.7 Msi

Bulk Modulus

128 GPa18.6 Msi
130 GPa18.9 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.33
0.35

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

510 MPa74 ksi
585 MPa84.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

400 MPa58 ksi
510 MPa74 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
4%

Shear Strength

330 MPa47.9 ksi
380 MPa55.1 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

180 MPa26.1 ksi
200 MPa29 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

150 HB
165 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

80 HRB
87 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

158 HV
180 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.73 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.7 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

954°C1,749 °F
1,040°C1,904 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,021°C1,870 °F
1,090°C1,994 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

45 W/m·K26 BTU/hr·ft·°F
29 W/m·K16.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

195 J/g83.8 BTU/lb
—

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

180°C356 °F
200°C392 °F

Min Service Temperature

-200°C-328 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 16.2 µm/m·K9 µin/in·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

9 % IACS
6 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.92×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.56 µΩ·in
2.9×10⁻⁷ Ω·m11.4 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.26 V
-0.22 V

Corrosion Resistance

62 / 100
68 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

20%
25%

Weldability

40 / 100
55 / 100

Formability (cold)

60 / 100
45 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

88 / 100
80 / 100

Polishability

90 / 100
85 / 100

Castability

—
35 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 30 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.2 kg CO₂/kg
5.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb
320 L/kg38.3 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 78 MJ/kg33,534 BTU/lb · Typical Recycled Content 40%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

58 kN·m/kg
67 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

14.5 MN·m/kg
14.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

630 kJ/m³
1,040 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

13.7 mm²/s
8.8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

11
8

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC74500C76400

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC74500C76400
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C74500 vs C76400 — frequently asked

Is C76400 stronger than C74500?

Yes. C76400 has a typical yield strength of 510 MPa (74 ksi) against 400 MPa (58 ksi) for C74500 — about 28% more. Tensile strength is 585 MPa (84.8 ksi) vs 510 MPa (74 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C74500 or C76400?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, C74500 or C76400?

C76400. Its weldability rates good (55/100) against fair (40/100) for C74500.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C74500 and C76400 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.